Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ohioWfan
"I'm going to repeat for the very last time that I HAVE NO PROBLEM WITH PEOPLE WHO OBJECTED TO THIS NOMINATION. What I have had problems with are the ruthless attacks on her person and her character, and on the President as well."

That is fair. But most who opposed her were not in that category. It is difficult to object to a nominee because in comparison to other candidates her Judicial, Constitutional, and Conservative credentials are lacking, without the appearance of making personal attacks.

2,461 posted on 10/27/2005 11:30:35 AM PDT by TAdams8591 (It's the Supreme Court, stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2365 | View Replies ]


To: TAdams8591
I have made it very clear from the beginning, and have never said otherwise, that the problem I had was with people who were vicious, and not with people who questioned her qualifications.

I have never said anything that would make anyone think otherwise.

I have asked people repeatedly to stick to the issues and not attack the President's, or in this case, Miers' character.

There are hundreds of us who feel that way. Discussion is one thing. Vicious attacks are quite another.

All I said from the beginning is.........let's let her have her hearing and make an informed decision when she does. It didn't happen, and for that, I am not pleased. However, I am relieved that this is over, and taking a breath before the same nasty minority begins its attack on whomever the President chooses next.........because it WILL happen.

2,525 posted on 10/27/2005 11:50:51 AM PDT by ohioWfan (Take comfort, Friend George, God is with thee!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2461 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson