Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: xzins; Alamo-Girl; marron; Howlin
There are republicans, too many of them, who will jump ship if it comes to a nuclear option vote. The nominee will then fail.... I think we need to walk down that road to prove that point.

I think you are exactly right about that, xzins, and the Senate shall virtually certainly provide that demonstration/object lesson soon enough. If anything, not a few of those guys are trying to distance themselves from the President in the run-up to next year's elections. They would prefer to campaign on local, not national issues -- at least, that is what I'm hearing right now.

I have a modest proposal, since it is clear to me that the "nuclear option" likely would not survive the caving of "our own people" in the Gang of Fourteen. My modest proposal is pretty simple, really: If the Dems want to filibuster the President's next "controversial" nominee (and all the President's nominees are "controversial," doncha know?), let 'em do it; but make 'em do it "the old-fashioned way."

That is, restore the original Senate rule regarding the filibuster: It must be done around-the-clock, with no "time-outs" or breaks. The floor must be continually held 24/7 in order to keep the filibuster alive. You've seen the "old-fashioned filibuster" if you ever saw Jimmy Stewart's great movie, Mr. Smith Goes to Washington.

I wonder how many senators on either side of the aisle would be up for something like this. Which is why it could be a most useful rules change. Might improve the level of seriousness and self-discipline over there.

2,241 posted on 10/27/2005 10:39:27 AM PDT by betty boop (Nature loves to hide. -- Heraclitus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1974 | View Replies ]


To: betty boop
The problem is that the rules of the Senate are such that 50 opposing Senators have to be on hand to make a filibuster like that work.

So if it were a genuine filibuster by one Senator, it works. But if we force the Dems to be there, we have to stay there too. And I'm sure there are at least 6 Republicans whose health would not allow them to stay in the chamber for a few days.

2,247 posted on 10/27/2005 10:42:54 AM PDT by AmishDude (Welcome to the judicial oligarchy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2241 | View Replies ]

To: betty boop

Thank you for the excellent suggestion! Indeed, if they want to filibuster, make them do it the old fashioned way.


2,250 posted on 10/27/2005 10:43:33 AM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2241 | View Replies ]

To: betty boop

Wonderful advice!!! :D Love it!


2,254 posted on 10/27/2005 10:44:11 AM PDT by mosquitobite (What we permit; we promote. ~ Mark Sanford for President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2241 | View Replies ]

To: betty boop
That is, restore the original Senate rule regarding the filibuster: It must be done around-the-clock, with no "time-outs" or breaks. The floor must be continually held 24/7 in order to keep the filibuster alive.

This is an example of the type of thread that I would have provided a substantive response to, a month ago. Now, I will say only that you misunderstand the ways the Senate rules work now, and have worked in the past.

2,419 posted on 10/27/2005 11:19:28 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2241 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson