Replies

Welp, this is good news, but I'm going to reserve my celebration until we hear who he nominates next. I see no reason to get excited given his past track record on appointments. I've already been let down once, I'm not going to set myself up for that again.

Here ya go, Wolf. Exhibit A of what I was talking about.

This doofus thinks Bush's previous judicial picks were just dreadful.

I'll bet he's advocating that he appoint somebody like Brown or Owen! LOL!!!

This doofus thinks Bush's previous judicial picks were just dreadful.

I was talking about Roberts. I guess I should have said "previous SC pick". I didn't like it when he nominated him, because of the same reason I didn't like Miers: He was little known, and not very much of a track record. I put up with that because I knew there'd be another opening.

But then he nominates Miers. Even less known about her! That was very disappointing. I don't think it's much to ask that he nominate someone with a proven track record of strict Constitutional interpretation. How often do we get a chance to nominate someone to the Supreme Court?

Yes, his other picks to lesser courts have been fabulous. I apologize for my misuse of words. Thanks for pointing out my error with grace and style though! Nothing warms the cockles of one's heart than to be called a "doofus".

Here ya go, Wolf. Exhibit A of what I was talking about. This doofus thinks Bush's previous judicial picks were just dreadful.

Sink, he (or she) is probably not being honest. "I've already been let down once," he said. Yeah. Right. This would lead one to believe FourtySeven has had only one complaint re GWB.