Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fatnotlazy
I think this woman was treated unfairly from the beginning.

She may have been treated unfairly IN THE BEGINNING, but in recent days, the rhetoric around here against her has toned down as the emotions settled. Honestly, you cannot blame those of us who were upset in the beginning after pouring many hours and much money into getting W re-elected for one BIG reason, to get people we could trust on the Supreme Court. Emotions ran wild because:

1) Harriet Miers was not on ANYBODY'S list but Harry Reid's.

2) History has not proven well for our side with stealth candidates.

3) Many were prepared, in fact desired, W to nominate someone that we could rally around him with. She was not it.
1,067 posted on 10/27/2005 7:20:52 AM PDT by Eagle of Liberty (11, 175, 77, 93 - In Memory Always)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 875 | View Replies ]


To: Kerretarded

"She may have been treated unfairly IN THE BEGINNING,..."

***

No, I think Attorney Miers was mistreated even up until she bowed out. I wasn't referring merely to FR, but to all the bullchip in the media (mainstream AND Fox), on blogs, websites and just about everywhere else. I'm not saying EVERYONE treated her unfairly, but a lot more than I would have ordinarily expected. Legitimate concerns? Ok. But this was a smear campaign from beginning to end. And I don't think Attorney Miers deserved that. No one does.


1,896 posted on 10/27/2005 9:25:00 AM PDT by fatnotlazy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1067 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson