Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Vanity: She Has Spoken, and . . . I Was Wrong.
self | 1026/05 | LS

Posted on 10/26/2005 4:36:13 PM PDT by LS

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-209 next last
To: LS

This 1993 speech has stopped my waffeling between "wait and see and against".

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/nation/documents/miers/EWDSpeech.pdf

Put me "all in" as an anti-Miers unappeasable.


21 posted on 10/26/2005 4:50:17 PM PDT by NeoCaveman (In DC, Pork is what's for dinner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DTogo
It is our "duty," as he himself likes to say, to let him know when he is wrong, loud and clear.

Oh, you mean like millions of Americans have been doing about the borders for some years now?

22 posted on 10/26/2005 4:51:19 PM PDT by Black Tooth (The more people I meet, the more I like my dog.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

Read the speech link in #21.

Sounds to the left of Souter to me.


23 posted on 10/26/2005 4:51:32 PM PDT by NeoCaveman (In DC, Pork is what's for dinner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: LS
Reading all the welcomes it reads like alcoholics anonymous...

Hi, I'm ____________, and I was a Miers Lover.

24 posted on 10/26/2005 4:51:32 PM PDT by DCPatriot ("It aint what you don't know that kills you. It's what you know that aint so" Theodore Sturgeon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LS
I like your style. Well said.

LVM

25 posted on 10/26/2005 4:53:00 PM PDT by LasVegasMac ("God. Guts. Guns. I don't call 911." (bumper sticker))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: flashbunny
welcome to the dark side...

Yes, the dark world of slithering malcontents and unappeasables, troll like creatures, all desperately trying to undermine the President.

26 posted on 10/26/2005 4:54:55 PM PDT by Black Tooth (The more people I meet, the more I like my dog.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Black Tooth
Yes, the dark world of slithering malcontents and unappeasables, troll like creatures, all desperately trying to undermine the President.

You forgot elitist, sexist, cynics in a snit.

27 posted on 10/26/2005 4:55:56 PM PDT by NeoCaveman (In DC, Pork is what's for dinner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: LS

I agree, as a very conservative prolife evangelical conservative, I've been supportive of the Miers nomination because I support President Bush in this time of war and I think it's time for a conservative evangelical on the Supreme Court. However, now I am very concern about what she said about abortion in the 1993 speech, and I will not support someone who is pro-choice or pro-abortion.


28 posted on 10/26/2005 4:56:31 PM PDT by FreeRep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
LS has made a decision based on evidence, not on what a list of pundits said. That seems fair to me.

So what is your position? No change after reviewing the evidence?

29 posted on 10/26/2005 4:57:28 PM PDT by Black Tooth (The more people I meet, the more I like my dog.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

Suppose you are Senator Petronski. How do you vote on confirmation?


30 posted on 10/26/2005 4:57:38 PM PDT by somemoreequalthanothers (All for the betterment of "the state", comrade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
LS has made a decision based on evidence, not on what a list of pundits said. That seems fair to me. Most of you have already made up your minds and have been busy unearthing whatever supports your position. Big difference.

Yes, there is a big difference. I put myself in LS's camp for the reasons that he has. I'm a lawyer and had to deal with the nonsense about glass ceilings and all of that, BUT, even though I was a dem at the time, I saw affirmative action as dumb and destructive and I could not have been more opposed to IOLTA. I would never have supported bringing Gloria Steinam to speak to anyone. I've just had it with this wishy-washy woman. Bleh!

31 posted on 10/26/2005 4:57:58 PM PDT by Bahbah (Tony Schaffer is a hero)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: LS

President Bush should have called you first!


32 posted on 10/26/2005 4:59:02 PM PDT by ladyinred (It is all my fault okay?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: somemoreequalthanothers

I'm a "no" vote now. I can't imagine being shaken from that, but I won't rule it out.


33 posted on 10/26/2005 4:59:08 PM PDT by Petronski (The name "cyborg" to me means complete love and incredible fun. I'm filled with joy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident
You forgot elitist, sexist, cynics in a snit.

*Deep breath*...Elitist, sexist, cynical--possibly racist?--Bush-bashers who only posed as Republicans after 2000 to upset the harmony that is the strong, conservative, fiscally responsible GOP of today, meaning that they are REALLY stealth Democrats and probably voting for Hillary. Or...


34 posted on 10/26/2005 5:00:32 PM PDT by Das Outsider (What this tagline needs is more cowbell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

Me as well, but I am trying to learn as much as possible. Without devoting significant time to it, that is. That's why I'm lazy and hope others have done more research.


35 posted on 10/26/2005 5:01:46 PM PDT by somemoreequalthanothers (All for the betterment of "the state", comrade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: LS

Maybe those that support Meirs, by stating she brought forward Roberts, should think that maybe they will both turn the court leftward?...That is frightening. IOW, we are really in a situation of trust with the first pick, the second should be someone that is a high likelihood of being a strict constructionist.


36 posted on 10/26/2005 5:03:13 PM PDT by jeremiah (People wake up, the water is getting hot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LS

I just welcomed another to the dissendence movement, but as I told that individual, there is no pleasure for me on this side of the aisle nor likely for you. It is no fun to stand before someone I have respected prior and yell, "STOP".

As unfortunate luck would have it, I've had the same position about her chances of confirmation. I'm choosing to fight the odds, though I know the D.C. mindset is more prone towards telling it's constituents to hush than respecting their concerns and wishes.


37 posted on 10/26/2005 5:03:15 PM PDT by Soul Seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LS

For someone who doesn't follow all the Miers threads, could you more specifically tell me what she has said/written that trouble you? I'm not leaning "yea" or "nay" with the question, just asking the question.

What makes you think she is not pro-life, anti-immigration, anti-affirmative action, etc? How long ago is the citations you are going by and is there a chance these statements might have been used out of context or so long ago that they are generally useless (i.e. Bill Bennett and Rush Limbaugh quotes that the left has routinely distorted)?


38 posted on 10/26/2005 5:04:46 PM PDT by Tall_Texan (HOUSTON ASTROS - NATIONAL LEAGUE CHAMPIONS 2005)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LS

It took me a while to make up my mind, too.

The diversity and affirmative action evidence was what made me decide.

As to what happens from here, I am hopeful that such converts to opposition as Ed Whalen will begin to turn the tide, and that the President will get tough talking advice from someone he trusts on the inside, and so, Miers will withdraw her name.

If this happens, I think the next nominee will have stellar credentials, and be fairly firmly conservative, but will not, alas, be my favorite, JRB.

I admire your honest and humble change of heart.

Hope your book sales are going well!

Cheers,

Richard F.


39 posted on 10/26/2005 5:05:37 PM PDT by rdf (no sex and race preferences, not now, not ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LS

I wonder who W would have picked if we didn't have a bunch of RINO's in the Senate (Frist, Graham, Snow, Collins, McCain etc.)that would pee in their panties if he would have nominated Luttig or someone on the righter than right?

I wonder...


40 posted on 10/26/2005 5:05:38 PM PDT by GRRRRR (America is a better place because of people like us...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-209 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson