Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SmithL

Not really. The part you excerpted has her claiming that they didn't order her to be back at work on Monday the 17th. He said/she said. However the company gave her the entire week off before her husband's departure on Sunday the 16th, she admitted returning home Sunday nite of the 16th, and deciding not to come in on Monday the 17th. If the company is telling the truth, then the headline is misleading and she didn't show up to work when she was required to.


32 posted on 10/26/2005 4:00:34 PM PDT by Diddle E. Squat (SonofaBuckner Qualls and Lidge, king and queen of Choke City, USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: Diddle E. Squat

My point being that the headline assumes that she is telling the truth and the company was lying. It is a he said/she said situation, so that is irresponsible (but par for the course for the media and its templates.)


34 posted on 10/26/2005 4:03:09 PM PDT by Diddle E. Squat (SonofaBuckner Qualls and Lidge, king and queen of Choke City, USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson