1 posted on
10/26/2005 1:36:11 AM PDT by
bramdawg
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 next last
To: bramdawg
You really opened a can of worms with that question.
I immagine the department will tell you what to carry. The 40 will probably serve you as well as a .45 though the .45 is my prefrence after 40+ years experience with it. Good results wiith either caliber depends greatly where you put the bullet. In a gun fight, there is no caliber that makes you safe.
To: bramdawg
May you be safe and effective in you career, and God bless you and yours.
3 posted on
10/26/2005 1:42:37 AM PDT by
spetznaz
(Nuclear-tipped Ballistic Missiles: The Ultimate Phallic Symbol)
To: bramdawg
Hoo, boy! You'll get lots of opinions on this one. Bottom line, it comes down to whichever you're most comfortable with, and whichever you can control. You could carry a cannon in your holster, and it wouldn't make any difference if you couldn't control it and hit what you aim at. So shoot both at the range, if they'll allow it. Shoot as many rounds through each as possible, with as many different guns as possible, keeping in mind that certain departments may only allow certain guns. Then make your decision based on that.
4 posted on
10/26/2005 1:46:55 AM PDT by
Jokelahoma
(Animal testing is a bad idea. They get all nervous and give wrong answers.)
To: bramdawg
Most departments have policies on what you will carry. A few however still allow officers the choice. If I was on the job and given the choice, I would opt for a .357 mag revolver(yes a 6 shot wheel gun) and load with 125 grain hollow points (.357 rounds not .38 special). I know a lot of people will say you need the extra magazine capacity of a semi. But I disagree. If you can't hit your target with 6 rounds you have no business carrying a gun. And there is no semi that has the stopping power of a .357 mag. You can shoot someone with a 9mm or .40 cal and yes even the much vaunted .45 several times and not bring them down. But you hit someone with a 357 mag and promise you they will immediately desist in whatever anti-social behavior they were engaged in.
5 posted on
10/26/2005 1:47:38 AM PDT by
jec1ny
(Adjutorium nostrum in nomine Domine Qui fecit caelum et terram.)
To: bramdawg
Shot placement is vastly more important than caliber.
Handguns are a horrible tradeoff of power for portability.
Don't worry about caliber. Use what you can hit with.
I'm sure the mathematicians and statisticians will be along shortly.
To: bramdawg
Pick whichever you can shoot the straightest, or feel most comfortable using. I don't think they're far enough apart to otherwise matter.
8 posted on
10/26/2005 1:57:09 AM PDT by
Jaysun
(Democrats: We must become more effective at fooling people.)
To: bramdawg
Learn to shoot as well as you can and either caliber will serve you well, Fail to learn and neither will. Shot placement is what matters. If you have that mastered then it's a matter of which one feels best in your hand and points most naturally.
9 posted on
10/26/2005 1:59:28 AM PDT by
muir_redwoods
(Free Sirhan Sirhan, after all, the bastard who killed Mary Jo Kopechne is walking around free)
To: bramdawg
Follow up to my previous post (5). If your limited in your selection to either a 45 or a .40 you could really go either way. Comfort will dictate a lot and your ability to use the weapon effectively. I personally think the .45 is the on;y semi I have any real use for, but then again I am not on the job. There are arguments for both. The .45 probably would give you slightly better stopping power at the expense of magazine capacity and accuracy at longer range. The inverse is true for the.40 caliber. Other issues would include what kind of community are you going to be working in etc. I am not a fan of hand guns for gun fights. A shotgun is my first choice. As you can see I am a fan of stopping power. I tend to believe in using the most immediately effective (stopping power) weapon that your able to carry comfortably and handle effectively. Hence my preference for the .357 mag. But there are a host of issues that relate to your job that I don't have to deal with. But in simple terms thats my advice. Find out what weapons they will let you carry. Then figure out which ones you are able to carry comfortably and use with proficiency, and then if you have more than one choice opt for the one with the most stopping power.
11 posted on
10/26/2005 2:06:24 AM PDT by
jec1ny
(Adjutorium nostrum in nomine Domine Qui fecit caelum et terram.)
To: bramdawg
In my experience a .40 tends to kick a bit more than a .45, possibly from a higher powder load. If I remember my rudimentary training correctly a .40 has a load of 1360-or so grains vs. 1140 for a .45. From my experience, they seem to do about the same amount of damage to a target but since I haven't shot any humans I don't know how well each would work on a man. :)
I'd say that you should go with whatever has the higher capacity; when you get into the size range of .40 and up I don't think that stopping power is really an issue. I just wouldn't want to die for lack of shooting back.
Good luck with your new job and keep safe.
To: bramdawg; Darksheare
I want the best gun for my job. If you want a gun, get a 12 ga.
Or were you considering a pistol?
If you're not just trolling this political forum and are asking a serious question, go here.
15 posted on
10/26/2005 2:15:30 AM PDT by
glock rocks
(A computer beat me at chess once. It lost at close range handguns.)
To: bramdawg
Get whatever one holds the most bullets.
17 posted on
10/26/2005 2:21:41 AM PDT by
irishtenor
(At 270 pounds, I am twice the bike rider Lance is.)
To: bramdawg
Go with the 1911 .45 It has more knock down power But walls will stop it easier. Were the .40 will go through to hit who knows what. Everyone misses sometime.
The SW .40 was nothing more that the government showing how it take a 10mm cut it down, and waste a pile of money for something it did not need.
The .40 is nothing new. the Cowboys had them too. But people just dont read there history. The US went from using the LC .45 to the .38 Went to the Philippines. found out the .38 didnt do the job. Got the old Colt .45s out and developed the 1911
Fast F to the 80s All the PD & the military had to get new bad toys. And went out and got all those 9mm Which is basically the same as a .38 What did they find out. She just
dont get the job done. But the government is never wrong. Right /s They couldnt say we should have gone with the 1911 They needed to spend a whole lot of tax money for something new.
They first looked at the new bret 10mm But that was too much power. So it was cut down into the SW .40 When all they had to do was go with the good old .45 auto.
Its sad that even after Golf I It was seen the 9mm was junk. and everyone asked to keep the 1911 They still use that 9mm crap.
To: bramdawg
22 posted on
10/26/2005 2:28:15 AM PDT by
Treader
(Hillary's dark smile is reminiscent of Stalin's inhuman grin...)
To: bramdawg
I would guess the department will suggest your side arm, but me, I would carry whatever the most popular .cal in the area is for a backup
if push comes to shove and I have to count on picking up ammo where I can find it, I want to use what is most likely to be found
IMO
25 posted on
10/26/2005 2:33:03 AM PDT by
sure_fine
(*not one to over kill the thought process*)
To: bramdawg
Welcome to the Freep bramdawg.
Go with the S&W wheel gun in .357 caliber.
Or go back to DU.
Whatever.
28 posted on
10/26/2005 2:49:23 AM PDT by
mmercier
To: bramdawg
I've got to laugh at this post. Sorry.
Choice of caliber and type of weapon will be [should be] dictated by the department as set forth in their rules and regulations, which you are, as yet, apparently unfamiliar with.
You should have been instructed, or will be, that the probability of being over twenty feet from the subject in a gun fighting action is rare.
Whatever caliber you are issued, you must learn to hit the target at that distance. And for off duty, the gun you use will be pre-approved by the department.
Good luck in the academy, should you make it.
29 posted on
10/26/2005 3:23:16 AM PDT by
G.Mason
(Americas most based enemy is the Democrat Party)
To: bramdawg
Having carried and shot them all. You well find out with the proper bullets ie good jacketed hollow points there is not much differants in stopping power.
With FMJ they all have a bad rep. Compare a good 9mm JHP to A FMJ 45 the 9mm wins.
You will find the 40 a good compromise in caliber size and mag cap.
I think you should read Handgun stopping power and Street Street stoppers by Marshall and Sanow. These 2 books give a very good over view of the subject.
To: bramdawg
31 posted on
10/26/2005 3:39:21 AM PDT by
Treader
(Hillary's dark smile is reminiscent of Stalin's inhuman grin...)
To: bramdawg
Not gonna reply- to anyone here, are ya? Now that a Mod is protecting you, feel free to indoctrinate at will.
32 posted on
10/26/2005 3:58:35 AM PDT by
Treader
(Hillary's dark smile is reminiscent of Stalin's inhuman grin...)
To: bramdawg
"Real men say POINT*FIVE*OH"
/sarc
36 posted on
10/26/2005 4:19:59 AM PDT by
xcamel
(No more RINOS - Not Now, Not Ever Again.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-57 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson