Does it really matter if Libby or Rove gets indicted?

e-mail | 10/25/05

[syriacus]

I still feel this whole circus will damage our intelligence capabilities in the future as it is put out there for all (potential recruits) to see, not just those already involved in intelligence gathering.

Here's hoping the potential recruits have enough sense to know there are all sorts of enemies to the US.

[ArmyBratproud]

You need to understand how the law is written. If she was covert....but it was a certain number of years back...then it does not matter if she was disclosed. NO LAW BROKEN.

Not to mention...that SHE told everybody what she did.

[Sun Soldier]

"You need to understand how the law is written."

I understand that most likely no laws were broken. My main point is that who is going to want to work covertly for our country against their own when they can see that our own government officials can't keep their pie holes shut. I can only see it having a negative impact on our recruiting efforts. Do you agree or disagree?

Also, she may have told "everyone" but it didn't make the news until somebody wanted it to. That's the shame, crime or not.

[eyespysomething]

Sorry I missed this last night.

I was thinking yesterday (in fact I was talking to myself) that it doesn't matter if they get indicted. As always, conservatism is right and will win every time ideas are brought into the arena.

It is hard, with the media etc against everything we do and stand for, and the fact they hate America. But it is a fight we can't give up.

If a crime has been committed, then indict 'em. Let it all come out in court.

Conservatism isn't on trial here, no matter how much the lefty liars try to portray that. I will continue to hold my head high.