To: The Ghost of FReepers Past
In answer to one question on the Senate questionnaire, she referred to the proportional representation requirement of the equal protection clause. I'll have to learn about that one, which I haven't heard about in 14 years of teaching con law.:)
It's gotten so bad that her supporters here have to wonder how long the farce can continue, or how many more lumps they can take.
10 posted on
10/20/2005 9:38:46 PM PDT by
phelanw
To: phelanw
I'm sorry, I didn't mean that as a direct answer to your question. The info I cited came from an article in the wash compost.
12 posted on
10/20/2005 9:41:46 PM PDT by
phelanw
To: phelanw
She's an intellectual lightweight.
What a farce.
19 posted on
10/20/2005 10:00:34 PM PDT by
tomahawk
To: phelanw
You stated:
In answer to one question on the Senate questionnaire, she referred to the proportional representation requirement of the equal protection clause. I'll have to learn about that one, which I haven't heard about in 14 years of teaching con law.:)
Get on Westlaw and look up the equal protection clause jurisprudence on one man one vote. Does the case name Baker v. Carr ring a bell?
25 posted on
10/20/2005 10:38:23 PM PDT by
The Man
To: phelanw
It's gotten so bad that her supporters here have to wonder how long the farce can continue, or how many more lumps they can take.It's like a FReeper 'Survivor' show.
49 posted on
10/21/2005 6:15:19 AM PDT by
johnny7
(“What now? Let me tell you what now.”)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson