Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: phelanw

You stated:

In answer to one question on the Senate questionnaire, she referred to the proportional representation requirement of the equal protection clause. I'll have to learn about that one, which I haven't heard about in 14 years of teaching con law.:)

Get on Westlaw and look up the equal protection clause jurisprudence on one man one vote. Does the case name Baker v. Carr ring a bell?


25 posted on 10/20/2005 10:38:23 PM PDT by The Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: The Man
In Baker v. Carr the court answered one main question: is malapportionment justiciable? It had nothing to do with proportional representation. I think Frankfurter's dissent was on target.

The majority opinion was written by Brennan, the icon of liberal activism. Next.

26 posted on 10/20/2005 10:44:10 PM PDT by phelanw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson