Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Holy war looms over Disney's Narnia epic
Guardian Unlimited ^ | Sunday October 16, 2005 | by Paul Harris

Posted on 10/16/2005 7:34:14 AM PDT by cloud8

As the UK prepares for a CS Lewis movie blockbuster this Christmas, a row has broken out about its Christian message.

To millions The Chronicles of Narnia are a childhood tale of wonder and triumph now made into a film that could inspire millions of children to read. To others, including the celebrated fantasy author Philip Pullman, they are stories of racism and thinly veiled religious propaganda that will corrupt children rather than inspiring them.

Either way, one thing is certain: this Christmas, and perhaps the next six, depending on sequels, everyone will be talking about Narnia. Disney is already in the middle of one of the biggest marketing campaigns in recent cinematic history. It is trying to lure both mainstream filmgoers and evangelical Christians, who will respond to CS Lewis's parallels between his characters and the Bible. HarperCollins is set to publish 170 Lewis-related books in more than 60 countries, many of them Christian-themed works. Disney has hired Christian marketing groups to handle the film.

For Pullman, who is an avowed atheist and a critic of Lewis, that is bad news. 'If the Disney Corporation wants to market this film as a great Christian story, they'll just have to tell lies about it,' Pullman told The Observer

Pullman believes that Lewis's books portray a version of Christianity that relies on martial combat, outdated fears of sexuality and women, and also portrays a religion that looks a lot like Islam in unashamedly racist terms.

'It's not the presence of Christian doctrine I object to so much as the absence of Christian virtue. The highest virtue, we have on the authority of the New Testament itself, is love, and yet you find not a trace of that in the books,' he said.

The Narnia books, Pullman said, contained '...a peevish blend of racist, misogynistic and reactionary prejudice; but of love, of Christian charity, [there is] not a trace'.

Certainly that is not the view of Disney. Film executives are eagerly anticipating repeating the success last year of Mel Gibson's Jesus biopic The Passion of The Christ, which was shunned by mainstream studios and then picked up by the evangelical churches. The movie then stunned the film world by raking in hundreds of millions of dollars by tapping into the previously ignored Christian market.

Already American evangelicals are planning to use the Narnia film as a preaching tool. A group called Catholic Outreach has advertised for 150 co-ordinators across the country to help promote the film. It is also organising 'sneak peak' events at which trailers will be shown to church audiences and executives from the film will talk about the project.

Other Christian groups and study centres are getting behind the film too. 'We believe that God will speak the gospel of Jesus Christ through this film,' said Lon Allison, director of the Billy Graham Centre at Wheaton College in Illinois.

Ted Haggard, president of the National Association of Evangelicals, said that the film was an ideal way for a Christian message to be brought to people who would not otherwise go near a church. 'Here is yet another tool that many may find to be effective in communicating the message of Jesus to those who may not respond to other presentations,' he said.

As well as a huge potential force at the box office, the other possible benefit for Disney is to heal its long troubled relationship with America's evangelical community. Many Christian groups have often boycotted the company over such issues as holding special theme days for gays at Disneyland. But in the run-up to the Narnia release date on 9 December, evangelical leaders have been generous in their praise of the company they have often reviled.

But it is not all about God. The Chronicles of Narnia seems to offer a 'perfect storm' combination of factors. As well as having the Passion's appeal to Christians, it has the special effects and fantasy-laden appeal of The Lord of the Rings, Peter Jackson's box-office hit that also netted numerous Oscars. That film was also seen as a huge risk at the time, but Jackson's achievement confounded the critics and proved that 'swords and sorcery' movies could strike cinematic gold.

Trailers for the first Narnia film, called The Lion, The Witch and The Wardrobe after the first book in the chronicles, have already drawn comparisons to The Lord of the Rings' style and cinema presentation. It has the same powerful themes of a new world, complete with fantastic creatures and sweeping battle scenes against a beautiful landscape.

The final crucial element in Disney's planning is turning the Narnia films into a money-spinning franchise like the Harry Potter series. Lewis wrote a total of seven Narnia books, and if the first one is a huge hit the sequels will be inevitable. That means a new Narnia film could be released at Christmas, complete with spin-off merchandising and toys, every year until 2012.

But while Disney has bet big on Narnia and now waits with bated breath, there is already one winner in the saga. The film, just like The Lord of the Rings, was shot in New Zealand, which then reaped a tourism windfall. Now local tour companies are already planning to show visitors around the spot where the Narnia film's climactic battle scene was shot.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: atheism; christianity; cslewis; disney; moviereview; narnia; philippullman; pullman; uk
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-169 next last
To: SamAdams76

The reading is lighter, and the content is lighter. It's like comparing, "The Passion of the Christ" to "Ben Hur."

Narnia is child-friendly, but it does contain significant adult material. Apart from being Christian rather than witchy, Narnia compares more with Harry Potter than with Lord of the Rings. (Rowling was an avid Narnia fan.)

The conservative world view of Narnia is not quite so paleoconservative as Tolkein, who considered Beowulf as the END of British literature, but he is more overt. His Christian references are still mythological, but are much harder to miss. And he deals with modern society enough to be baldly political, trashing co-ed public schools, for instance, in books 3,4,5 and 7.


121 posted on 10/16/2005 7:43:42 PM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76

The reading is lighter, and the content is lighter. It's like comparing, "The Passion of the Christ" to "Ben Hur."

Narnia is child-friendly, but it does contain significant adult material. Apart from being Christian rather than witchy, Narnia compares more with Harry Potter than with Lord of the Rings. (Rowling was an avid Narnia fan.)

The conservative world view of Narnia is not quite so paleoconservative as Tolkein, who considered Beowulf as the END of British literature, but he is more overt. His Christian references are still mythological, but are much harder to miss. And he deals with modern society enough to be baldly political, trashing co-ed public schools, for instance, in books 3,4,5 and 7.


122 posted on 10/16/2005 7:43:42 PM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: cloud8

I'll be in the cineplex on Dec. 9th.


123 posted on 10/16/2005 7:46:54 PM PDT by Ciexyz (Let us always remember, the Lord is in control.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

Pullman is just like any other atheist that has determined there is no existence after time here on earth.

I guess if you want to cease to exist bad enough, you'll get what you want.


124 posted on 10/16/2005 9:02:40 PM PDT by A message
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: cloud8
In reading these posts, everyone seems to focus on C.S. Lewis as if Disney would follow the plot faithfully. I'd wager C.S. fans will fail to even detect the author's plot other than an obligatory reference or two. One of the great successes of the Tolkien series was the directors faithful adherence to the books. I just can't muster that kind of faith in Disney with whats happened in the last 30 years or so.

Yes, I will eagerly await the movie and see it, but I don't hold any big emotions one way or the other. That way it will be a pleasant surprise if it's not Disneyfied.

125 posted on 10/17/2005 12:54:43 AM PDT by chuckles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick; kstewskis; Victoria Delsoul; Raquel; Kelly_2000; kassie; lysie; Miss Marple; kayak
Pullman believes that Lewis's books portray a version of Christianity that relies on martial combat, outdated fears of sexuality and women, and also portrays a religion that looks a lot like Islam in unashamedly racist terms.

'It's not the presence of Christian doctrine I object to so much as the absence of Christian virtue. The highest virtue, we have on the authority of the New Testament itself, is love, and yet you find not a trace of that in the books,' he said.

You're right... this guy is a creep.

I am in the middle of reading it again, and I don't see anything in the book that resembles Islam fanaticism anywhere.

Absence of Christian virtue? What planet is this guy on? Mr. and Mrs. Beaver just rescued Lucy, Susan, and Peter from the White Witch.

Father Christmas?

The benevolent old gentleman who brings goodness to the land of Narnia. No Christian virtue? I don't know what this guy is reading, but it ain't The Lion, Witch, and the Wardrobe. This guy sure has got an axe to grind. I dare say that he's not showing any Christian virtue at all by lashing out at this film.

126 posted on 10/17/2005 3:43:31 AM PDT by Northern Yankee (Freedom Needs A Soldier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom
Thanks for the information.

Am teaching 7th grade Religious Ed this year. A great film to take the students to see.

Blessings to you.

127 posted on 10/17/2005 3:58:13 AM PDT by Northern Yankee (Freedom Needs A Soldier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick; Victoria Delsoul; kstewskis; Raquel; Kelly_2000; NYer
Reading that Pullman is an avowed atheist, I can see why there seems to be no Christian virtue in his statements, which raises a point of contradiction in him.

If he complains that the movie has no Christian virtue, then he must be admitting that there is Christian virtue out there. How is that possible, if he's an avowed atheist?

Like the agnostic telling the minister, "I don't believe in God, but what do you think God thinks of people like me?"

128 posted on 10/17/2005 4:06:00 AM PDT by Northern Yankee (Freedom Needs A Soldier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: cloud8

The big question is: WhoTF is Phillip Pullman and why should we give a rat's arse about what he thinks?

I'm looking forward to taking my daughters to see this. We watched all the WonderWorks adaptations.


129 posted on 10/17/2005 4:10:06 AM PDT by jaime1959
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chuckles

> One of the great successes of the Tolkien [movies] was the directors faithful adherence to the books.

I wonder if Christopher Tolkien as owner of the copyright might have insisted on it as part of the deal.

> I just can't muster that kind of faith in Disney's [treatment of CS Lewis] with whats happened in the last 30 years or so.

Who are Lewis's heirs?


130 posted on 10/17/2005 4:14:00 AM PDT by cloud8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: cloud8
I wonder if Christopher Tolkien as owner of the copyright might have insisted on it as part of the deal.

The film rights have been passed back and forth for years. Christopher Tolkein had zero say over the film adaptation of Lord of the Rings.

131 posted on 10/17/2005 4:18:58 AM PDT by Wormwood (Iä! Iä! Cthulhu fhtagn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: Northern Yankee
Oh, it doesn't surprise me. When people like this start on a rant, they don't see anything but what they want to see.

The book talks about loyalty and honor. Aslan at the Stone Table is a perfect example of Christian love.

I have never read this Pullman characters' books, and from what I have seen here, I don't believe I will.

132 posted on 10/17/2005 4:20:08 AM PDT by Miss Marple (Lord, please look after Mozart Lover's son and keep him strong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: chuckles
I'd wager C.S. fans will fail to even detect the author's plot other than an obligatory reference or two. One of the great successes of the Tolkien series was the directors faithful adherence to the books. I just can't muster that kind of faith in Disney with whats happened in the last 30 years or so.

One of the producers of this film was Douglas Gresham, C. S. Lewis's step-son. I've read interviews with him, and he seems to have worked hard to keep Lewis's ideas in the movie. He was there to make sure they were NOT watered down. Disney is only the vehicle to get this film in the theaters. It was not written or developed by the Disney folks, but brought to them for funding and distribution.

133 posted on 10/17/2005 4:22:42 AM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: t2buckeye

didnt Chesterton hang with these guys too ?


134 posted on 10/17/2005 4:23:33 AM PDT by Revelation 911
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: drhogan
I have read that it specifically was written as an anti-Narnia.

Dan

135 posted on 10/17/2005 4:26:24 AM PDT by BibChr ("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Panic in the Streets

Okay so it isn't just me. That's something I haven't understood. I recall a fair amount of sorcery and the like in the Narnia series . . .


136 posted on 10/17/2005 4:31:53 AM PDT by twinzmommy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
Sorry Sam, IMHO - they aren't even close. LOTR is an enormous, deep, riveting, multi-layered complex story (the best pure story I have ever read). Narnia is shallow, obvious, Christian allegory. No depth whatsoever. (I JUST read it all about 4 months ago for the first time - there won't be a second reading (LOTR has had at least 8 in 30 years)).

Not that I have any "problem" with Narnia....it just ain't that good!

137 posted on 10/17/2005 4:32:32 AM PDT by KeepUSfree (WOSD = fascism pure and simple.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Sam Cree

LOL I never ever as a kid thought of them as "Christian" books (I'm Jewish too). It just flat never occurred to me.

*shrugs*


138 posted on 10/17/2005 4:37:47 AM PDT by twinzmommy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: rightwingreligiousfanatic
Cair Paravel

I haven't heard that in a long time.

looking forward to the film.
139 posted on 10/17/2005 5:09:43 AM PDT by Jet Jaguar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
For those who have, how does C.S. Lewis compare to J.R.R. Tolkien?

I can't speak with regards to book comparisons, but I do know that Tolkien and Lewis were acquainted and influenced each other.

140 posted on 10/17/2005 5:24:46 AM PDT by Bear_Slayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-169 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson