To: MNJohnnie
And the proof she will not is.....?
Okay. You really have to settle down. Your post #256 was awesome. You are jumping on people too fast. What I wrote was that O'Reilly wants to make those who question the nomination out to be similar to liberal activist loons. Most people who are questioning the nomination don't want a conservative activist, but a strict constructionist. I am not saying that she won't be. I am waiting patiently for the Committee hearings. Don't jump my case. Just pointing out that O'Reilly has no clue as to why there are questions.
309 posted on
10/13/2005 10:42:14 AM PDT by
Eagle of Liberty
(11, 175, 77, 93 - In Memory Always)
To: Kerretarded
And the proof she will not is.....? Okay. You really have to settle down. Your post #256 was awesome
Ok, sorry. Did not know I wasn't allowed to ask a simple question.
319 posted on
10/13/2005 10:44:40 AM PDT by
MNJohnnie
(I'll try to be NICER, if you will try to be SMARTER!.......Water Buckets UP!)
To: Kerretarded
. What I wrote was that O'Reilly wants
I have NO desire to try and defend O'Reilly after Rather and the Swift Boat Vets, he is beyond the pale so fire it up.
347 posted on
10/13/2005 10:53:18 AM PDT by
MNJohnnie
(I'll try to be NICER, if you will try to be SMARTER!.......Water Buckets UP!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson