[MNJohnnie]

And the proof she will not is.....? Okay. You really have to settle down. Your post #256 was awesome

Ok, sorry. Did not know I wasn't allowed to ask a simple question.

[Eagle of Liberty]

Ok, sorry. Did not know I wasn't allowed to ask a simple question.

Don't mind questions, but I know that you want proof from anyone that attacks Miers in any way. I did not attack her. I have no proof. I have not formed an opinion on the matter yet and will not until I see her in the hearings.

[Eagle of Liberty]

Found the Talking Points - by Bill O'Reilly

Activist judges: that's the subject of this evening's "Talking Points Memo". Recent court rulings allowing the release of more Abu Ghraib (search) pictures, live sex acts in Oregon, and a ban on "under God" in the pledge of allegiance point out that liberal judges are hell-bent on changing America to fit their secular progressive points of view.

Now the right is outraged over these decisions as its should be. But hold it. What about Harriet Miers? The Supreme Court nominee is being brutally attacked by some conservatives because she's not activist enough. They don't know where she stands on conservative causes. They want assurances she'll vote the conservative party line.

Isn't that judicial activism? Aha! If you don't want the left-wing activism, you can't demand right wing zealotry.