Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Do not dub me shapka broham
If the radical, anti-American, anti-Constitution doctrinaire leftists want to take pride in Ruthie, then so be it.

Except that Ruthie was an eminently qualified attorney, and one's argument is "merely" philosophical.

125 posted on 10/12/2005 5:16:45 AM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: AndyJackson
She may have been qualified as an attorney, law professor, and counsel to the ACLU, but not for a seat on the Supreme Court.
132 posted on 10/12/2005 5:20:25 AM PDT by Do not dub me shapka broham ("We don't want a Supreme Court justice just like George W. Bush. We can do better.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies ]

To: AndyJackson
Except that Ruthie was an eminently qualified attorney, and one's argument is "merely" philosophical.

Evidently not. Kelo, et al. The woman wouldn't know the constitution if it bit her on the ass but in your nicely ordered world she was "eminently qualified" to expand eminent domain beyond all recognition.

Perhaps she's an argument for not quite "eminently qualified"?

154 posted on 10/12/2005 5:34:49 AM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson