Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AndyJackson
Except that Ruthie was an eminently qualified attorney, and one's argument is "merely" philosophical.

Evidently not. Kelo, et al. The woman wouldn't know the constitution if it bit her on the ass but in your nicely ordered world she was "eminently qualified" to expand eminent domain beyond all recognition.

Perhaps she's an argument for not quite "eminently qualified"?

154 posted on 10/12/2005 5:34:49 AM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies ]


To: jwalsh07

I remember the announcement His Slickness made of Ruthie's nomination to the SCOTUS. Even back then, she wore her gender on her sleeve as if that were the SOLE REASON she should be put on that court.

Makes me wanna hurl.


155 posted on 10/12/2005 5:36:07 AM PDT by sauropod (Polite political action is about as useful as a miniskirt in a convent -- Claire Wolfe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson