Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jim Robinson
...conservative (that means pro-life)...

While I agree that President Bush should have taken the fight to the Dems and nominated an openly conservative nominee, I'd define "conservative" as someone who interprets the Constitution as it's written, leaving "pro-life" as something that merely follows from that, as appropriate.

But regardless, what galls me is exactly what you said...the move he made is WEAK. With all due respect, even if she turns out to vote pro-life, this nomination has strengthened the opposition and is a bad one.

764 posted on 10/13/2005 8:36:51 PM PDT by Gondring (I'll give up my right to die when hell freezes over my dead body!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies ]


To: Gondring

True. But the battle really boils down to the liberals and RINOs rejecting ALL nominees who are suspected as being pro-life.


765 posted on 10/13/2005 8:46:28 PM PDT by Jim Robinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 764 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson