Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: KDD
It would have been interesting to see the hoops the democrats would have had to jump through to deny her appointment to the SC at this point. It was all set to go and Bush blew it.

I was looking forward to a good fight, too. But that battle has been called off, and it is time to face a new day and get ready for a different fight, instead of vandalizing and pillaging our own towns.

Fighting yesterday's fight gets us nowhere. Anyone who has tangible objections to Miers should contact the White House or the Judiciary committee or their Senators, instead of making up stories about Miers and about Bush's reasons for chosing her.

Here is a breakdown of Frum's arguments to continue the rock throwing:

  1. "Miers nomination was the most unpopular since Robert Bork's in 1987"
    (Is this a good reason for Bork-loving conservatives to attack Miers?)
  2. "As conservatives digest their disappointment and betrayal, their approval of the President is likely to decline. "
    (Self-fulfilling prophecy----"Conservatives" like Frum attack Bush. Bush's numbers go down. Conservatives like Frum attack Bush for his declining numbers...etc)
  3. "Her door was always open and the M&Ms were always available."
    (Now we know Harriet Miers shares candy like Ronald Reagan did---is that a bad thing?)
  4. "Offending your supporters has real-world consequences."
    (I'm not offended at Bush. I'm offended at the folks throwing rocks at the "unknown entity" Harriet Miers, before her hearings)
  5. "With one grave misjudgment, George W. Bush has shattered the coalition that brought and returned him to power in 2000 and 2004.
    "(Frum says practically anyone of any importance is aligned against Bush. So the coalition is still strong... it's just not strongly in favor of Bush, who isn't running for office again )
Frum's column is good for one thing, I have to admit....as a source for the names of the people aligned against Harriet Miers before she has her hearings.

While all this arguing is going on, it's a good time for conservatives to search their hearts to see if they really wanted "originalists" on the court or if they really wanted "conservatives" on the court.

172 posted on 10/11/2005 8:21:45 AM PDT by syriacus (Harriet Miers deserves hearings and an up/down vote, not rocks thrown by "Harriet's Harriers")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 141 | View Replies ]


To: syriacus
I was looking forward to a good fight, too. But that battle has been called off, and it is time to face a new day and get ready for a different fight, instead of vandalizing and pillaging our own towns.

So when the going gets tough the get consent forms...from Harry Reid?

179 posted on 10/11/2005 8:32:05 AM PDT by KDD (A wink is as good as a nod to a blind horse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies ]

To: syriacus
While all this arguing is going on, it's a good time for conservatives to search their hearts to see if they really wanted "originalists" on the court or if they really wanted "conservatives" on the court.

I like this line of thought. How would you differentiate between the two?

217 posted on 10/11/2005 9:18:09 AM PDT by GB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson