Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: streetpreacher
"So you expect us to believe that every qualified constitutionalist jurist declined the nomination based on skeletons in their closets?"
I don't know why you would have a problem believing this.

Didn't the same thing happen to Perot?

Someone (the evil Bush's, in his mind) had pictures of his daughter that were going to be exposed just before her wedding.

Apparently this kind of stuff happens all of the time.

/sarcasm

688 posted on 10/09/2005 8:08:08 PM PDT by Souled_Out
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]


To: Souled_Out

Kind of makes one wonder why Clinton was so concerned about revelations of sex in the Oval Office. Why would a well-connected mobster have the slightest compunction over such revelations? Oh. It's his "legacy" that needs to be preserved. Gimme a break!


694 posted on 10/09/2005 8:16:10 PM PDT by Fester Chugabrew (Hillary and cattle. It's the future, and it's blight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 688 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson