[Urbane_Guerilla]

And, yes, you are, indeed, a dolt.

I may very well be a dolt. I have been humbled by reading Hugh Hewitt, disagreeing with him (in my mind) and then eventually realizing he was right all along.

That may happen here, in some respect. But in another respect, it will not. W is not my personal leader. He is not a man who believes in constitutional government. I am not bound to believe him.

The Miers decision was one some folks anticipated for 30 years. It came down to a moment. With an opportunity to completely and perfectly respond to the moment, W instead decided to nominate a retainer who was a cypher.

After that moment, I do not care. It was a smirk moment. Apart from how it all turns out, it was a moment of selfishness and betrayal.

I have always appreciated and respected your remarks Sink, but in this instance I disagree with you.

[Iris7]

I am bothered by your extraordinarily sanctimonious tone. It makes one wonder.

If the President were to nominate an overt Rightist to the Supreme Court he could rationally expect the nomination to be defeated. Therefore, he must nominate either a Leftist of a cypher. As you certainly know.

[maryz]

He is not a man who believes in constitutional government.

He is not a man who can wave a wand or twitch his nose and make 40+ years of Dem supremacy (aided and abetted by the MSM) disappear.

[jpsb]

"I have always appreciated and respected your remarks Sink"

LOL!