Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Eva
I've listed them several times and am NOT going to go through it again, tonight.

You are more then welcome to read my posts.

250 posted on 10/08/2005 12:29:17 AM PDT by TAdams8591 (A Reagan Conservative and mighty proud of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 247 | View Replies ]


To: TAdams8591

Terry, I wasn't really including you in the group of nattering, naybobs of negativity. I was referring to the group of posters that have been posting ridiculous articles opposing Meirs and any other possible Bush nomination. If you check some of these people's posts, you will see that they have made only negative comments about all the judicial nominations and have not posted on any other subject for the past few months. They have an obvious agenda, though I am not certain what it is, possibly libertarian.

There is plenty of reason to object to the Meirs nomination, but the petty criticisms that have been made in many of the articles make no valid point. The real reason to object is the one Rush has given, that by nominating a woman with no judicial experience, Bush has avoided the fight with the left over the judiciary, a fight that conservatives have been waging ever since the Bork nomination. It is disappointing, but it doesn't give conservatives the right to personalize the attacks on Meirs and Bork her themselves.


320 posted on 10/08/2005 7:09:36 AM PDT by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 250 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson