Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: carton253
"They did... which means that she agrees with their judicial philopsy."

No, it doesn't. It means she picked out people with a judicial philosophy she thought the President was looking for.

She wasn't the only vetter. She had help.

223 posted on 10/08/2005 12:11:16 AM PDT by TAdams8591 (A Reagan Conservative and mighty proud of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies ]


To: TAdams8591; dagnabit; JerseyHighlander; Petronski
She helped to choose capable, qualified nominees for the federal bench.

However, all that proves is that she acquitted herself well in the role of White House Counsel.

It doesn't speak to her qualifications for the Supreme Court, which as far as I can tell, are rather nugatory.

230 posted on 10/08/2005 12:14:23 AM PDT by Do not dub me shapka broham ("I'm okay with being unimpressive. It helps me sleep better.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 223 | View Replies ]

To: TAdams8591
It means she picked out people with a judicial philosophy she thought the President was looking for.

So it turns out that she picked out solid conservative nominees because she knew that's what Bush wanted -- and then he picked her.

Can you not connect those dots?

236 posted on 10/08/2005 12:17:13 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 223 | View Replies ]

To: TAdams8591

Do you honestly think that she doesn't share the same views?


239 posted on 10/08/2005 12:18:52 AM PDT by carton253 (Never take counsels of your fears.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 223 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson