Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Betaille
The verdict is unanimous

No, it's not. There have been plenty of conservative pundits coming out for Miers. Sowell wrote a very good piece on the subject, and his analysis tends to be very rational and sober, unlike folks like Norquist and Weyrich, who have their own power bases and interests.

5 posted on 10/07/2005 12:17:14 PM PDT by dirtboy (Drool overflowed my buffer...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: dirtboy
Sowell said:

"We don't know. But President Bush says he has known Harriet Miers long enough that he feels sure.

For the rest of us, she is a stealth nominee. Not since The Invisible Man has there been so much stealth.

That's not ideal by a long shot"


This is not a glowing endorsement, it is the third stage of grief (denial, resentment, bargaining, depression,acceptance)

9 posted on 10/07/2005 12:26:06 PM PDT by msnimje (If you suspect this post might need a sarcasm tag..... it does!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: dirtboy

dirtboy wrote: "unlike folks like Norquist and Weyrich, who have their own power bases and interests."

So let me get this straight...anyone who opposes her is irrational and serving special interests, while those in favor of her are rational and sober?

Personally, I studied the arguments on both sides. They both make good points. However, the very fact that there ARE two sides within the conservative base makes this nomination stink. We are at war with each other instead of the libs.

In my opinion, Bush should have picked a nomination to unite his base. Even if we would have lost in the Senate, sometimes it's important to fight the fight. Who knows? We might have even won the fight, but you'll never know since he picked a lackluster crony instead.


11 posted on 10/07/2005 12:26:43 PM PDT by CitizenUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: dirtboy

I could be wrong but I thought Weyrich said he was never voting Republican again sometime ago.Does this mean he has changed?


28 posted on 10/07/2005 12:35:14 PM PDT by aumrl (I TRUST BUSH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: dirtboy
Sowell wrote a very good piece on the subject, and his analysis tends to be very rational and sober, unlike folks like Norquist and Weyrich, who have their own power bases and interests.

People with no power bases, like Sowell and Williams, must sing for their supper and suck up to the boss for whatever scraps he deigns to throw.

53 posted on 10/07/2005 12:50:21 PM PDT by Sam the Sham (A conservative party tough on illegal immigration could carry California in 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: dirtboy
Sowell wrote a very good piece on the subject, and his analysis tends to be very rational and sober

Actually, IIRC, Sowell wrote that the Republican Party is a gaggle of unprincipled sleazeballs, and the Miers pick was justified on the grounds that she's the one he could slip by the weasels.

But I don't recall Bush Jr. campaigning exactly a year ago with "I don't have the guts to fight Jim Jeffords, so I'm going to nominate cyphers for the Supreme Court. Vote for me!"

101 posted on 10/07/2005 1:31:49 PM PDT by Hank Rearden (Never allow anyone who could only get a government job attempt to tell you how to run your life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson