To: Brilliant
What it means is that she wants the UN proposal on small arms trade [essentially a world-wide ban on civilian ownership of firearms] to go into effect so that Canada will not have to do its own policing and will not have to take responsibility for its own criminals (including the ones in Parliament) Not that such a scheme would have any effect on violence except to ensure that only criminals have weapons.
16 posted on
10/07/2005 12:35:32 PM PDT by
45Auto
(Big holes are (almost) always better.)
To: 45Auto
Since we have a constitutional amendment that guarantees the right to bear arms, a treaty saying we can't would be worthless. Maybe these Canadians need a lesson in how our government works. They don't seem to be very up on it.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson