Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Brilliant
What it means is that she wants the UN proposal on small arms trade [essentially a world-wide ban on civilian ownership of firearms] to go into effect so that Canada will not have to do its own policing and will not have to take responsibility for its own criminals (including the ones in Parliament) Not that such a scheme would have any effect on violence except to ensure that only criminals have weapons.
16 posted on 10/07/2005 12:35:32 PM PDT by 45Auto (Big holes are (almost) always better.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: 45Auto

Since we have a constitutional amendment that guarantees the right to bear arms, a treaty saying we can't would be worthless. Maybe these Canadians need a lesson in how our government works. They don't seem to be very up on it.


23 posted on 10/07/2005 2:32:12 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson