Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: P-Marlowe; Buggman; Revelation 911; Corin Stormhands; The Grammarian; jude24; blue-duncan; ...
The Inclusive Bible follows the higher critics in leaving out the Pastoral Epistles and Revelation, and it follows The Da Vinci Code in including instead the Gnostic Gospel of Thomas. This translation is endorsed by the Archbishop of Canterbury, Rowan Williams, and the evangelical leader Tony Campolo.

They're not serious, are they? Is this satire? Does anyone know if this is true?

21 posted on 10/07/2005 8:56:46 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: xzins
This revision of the canon is true - that's the actual canon they use.

Williams and Campolo have complimented the translation, but they ahve not to my knowledge officially "endorsed" it for use in ministry.

23 posted on 10/07/2005 8:58:39 AM PDT by wideawake (God bless our brave troops and their Commander-in-Chief)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: xzins
I don't see any indication of satirical content on the site it's posted from.

This is hardly surprising though.

40 posted on 10/07/2005 9:31:35 AM PDT by Frumanchu (Inveterate Pelagian by birth, Calvinist by grace.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: xzins

My thoughts exactly... read post #32.


46 posted on 10/07/2005 9:34:27 AM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: xzins; fortheDeclaration
hey're not serious, are they? Is this satire? Does anyone know if this is true?

Kinda makes you want to become a KJV Only'er, eh?

67 posted on 10/07/2005 9:57:46 AM PDT by P-Marlowe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: xzins; P-Marlowe; Buggman; Revelation 911; Corin Stormhands; The Grammarian; jude24; blue-duncan
They're not serious, are they? Is this satire? Does anyone know if this is true?

Whatever Campolo might be, stupid is not on that list. i have serious doubts about the accuracy of the article, and for good reason: These "endoursements" are something i have seen before.

In other circles, diverse people of influence are often sent articles, papers, and books for their input. The reasoning is that even bad publicity is still publicity. More readers can be obtained by virtue of the controversy if nothing else. It is often true that The 'reviewer' has not even read what it is he/she is supposedly reviewing, and the 'review' doesn't even bear the name on close inspection.

You will notice in mny cases the 'reviewer' does not endourse the conclusions of the book/paper/article, and does not speak of the position at all. It doesn't mean that Williams, Campolo, et. al. agree with the book, the scholarship, the conclusions, or even the need for such a book/paper. In many cases, the 'reviewer' isn't even qualified to discuss the subject matter. Some of you may recall Dave Hunt's citation of Dr. Richard Feinman, a NASA Physicist, concerning the subject of psychology in one of his books. Hunt took a lot of heat for that (and rightfully so). One must carefull read the comments, and not draw conclusions not warrented by the comment.

It is a common trick of cultists, and aborrant theologians, and creates a veneer of legitimacy for an otherwise shoddy work.

169 posted on 10/07/2005 2:12:37 PM PDT by Calvinist_Dark_Lord (I have come here to kick @$$ and chew bubblegum...and I'm all outta bubblegum! ~Roddy Piper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

To: xzins
They're not serious, are they? Is this satire? Does anyone know if this is true?

Not satire. This so called translation actually exists. The Archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams did write the forward. Don't know if that constitutes an endorsement or not, but I can't picture writing a forward for a work that I didn't approve of... As far as Campolo, I haven't yet found a link, but he has been getting flakier and flakier as the years go by. Here are some links to comments about this 'translation':

Bible Researcher

Apologetics Press

And this from a liberal viewpoint... Nimble Spirit
(I've never run into a liberal Mennonite before..)

239 posted on 10/08/2005 5:33:25 PM PDT by NoCmpromiz (What part of John 14:6 don't you get?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson