It's interesting that you need to ping the E-troops to attack me.
No, what's interesting is that you would jump to such a paranoid (and incorrect) conclusion as to why I pinged folks.
Didn't take long for the Evolutionists to proclaim the most essential feature of their natures: calling people who disagree with them names. Out of the blue.
Are you *really* this dense? It wasn't "out of the blue", sweetie, it was in response to YOUR unprovoked namecalling against a very large group of people, which you made in response to a reasonable, polite question.
I don't even know who you are and have not responded to you...
And yet, you chose to fire a broadside at all "evolutionists", including myself, when you wrote, "It must be true that evolutionists are thick." Gosh, I don't know *HOW* anyone could *possibly* have taken offense at such a slur. Just how "thick" are you yourself that you apparently have absolutely no clue as to what the effect of your scattershot insult might have been -- or apparently that you had even *made* one?
you refer to me as an a***le---
Yes. If the shoe fits, I certainly do. And I stand by it. Your current post has only further reinforced my original opinion.
I have no quarrel with Christian evolutionists...
Then maybe you shouldn't stupidly insult them.
I do with those who demand that our kids (in public schools) be taught as fact Big Bang without even a mention that God's hand might be behind the Creation.
If you ever actually meet anyone like that, do feel free to quarrel with them. I am, however, curious as to how you have jumped to the wild conclusion that anyone on this thread might hold such a position, and deserved to be lashed out at in a petty, childish manner
But wonders will not cease...you show your colors with the lunacy of the last question about slavery.
No, actually, I was wondering how *you* feel about the lunacy of the your fellow "Believers in the Lord" on this thread. Several of them have come out in favor of slavery due to Scripture, and most of the rest have pointedly failed to denounce such a position. I was thinking that perhaps you'd like to be the first to actually deplore such statements, but apparently not:
I know the answer about the Bible and slavery but I'll let you try to figure it out for yourself.
Lame dodge.
Go fry an egg why don't you... pathetic.
Wow, I'm stunned by your articulate and well-reasoned rebuttal. You have done such a great job of demonstrating the keen insights and penetrating wit of the kind of person who would be in a position to call others "thick"...
I'll just clarify. As of now, we don't have a single unambiguous denouncement of slavery from anyone on the creationist side of the debate in this thread. Every single creationist so far has picked one of the following options:
I had high hopes that we might get the first clear denouncement from Eleni; well actually I didn't. Clarity on this issue from those who get all their morals from the bible seems to be in short supply (even that isn't quite true, the pro-slavery crowd are admirably clear, just sickening)