Gossip? It was reported in a national news publication.
I have not accepted it as truth precisely because they have damaged their reputation.
I have asked clarification, rightly, from her on the topic.
I would suggest if your only contribution to this discussion is to level false assertions about my conduct, you cease. I will not indulge it. And perhaps you might also consult your own conduct in this manner.
yeah...and i think that to answer those questions you should do a little more to educate yourself on Ms.Meirs fruit before you call your sister in Christ to the carpet in front of others and do harm in other's eyes to what could be a very strong ally. What your doing is nothing more than gossiping about things you have no concrete evidence of. Your hypothesizing!
You declared me a gossip for referencing a news publication. That is an assault on my character. I wasn't referencing the national Enquirer. I stated factually what was in the article, then acknowledged their reputation as dented. What I did not state was that everything they print is inaccurate, it is not. You seem to sweep aside WAPO as nothing more than the National Enquirer, and that is factually untrue.
Matter of fact, I am not even sceptical of WAPO so much as I am Leahy. Which is why, if untrue, Miers should be given the opportunity to clear her name. Your real argument should be with those that unquestionably accept every word from Leahy's lips.
Further, you accuse me of intending to harm Ms. Meirs before the world. Very much untrue. This position is high profile, so is the confirmation process. It is inevitable these questions are asked in a public forum. I have no control over the environment in which questions are asked.
Thirdly, you claim I an unaware of Ms. Meir's experiences and work product. A falsehood.