Replies

"Am I excited about this pick? No! But am I going to keep an open mind about her? Yes! And why you may ask? Because so far we have gotten nothing but good judicial picks from the WH and because of that I have at least a reason to believe so far that she will be no different, no matter what the hole in the head gang believes."

Once again, amazing rhetoric on your part.

Lets hope you are correct on this woman and I am wrong.

But the most acerbic vitriol and attacks come from the Bush Bots - people who seem to feel that anything Bush does should go unquestioned.

This is a seat on the Supreme Court - not a mere cabinet appointment. It is most essential that a Justice be selected who will help put the brakes on the series of pro-homosexual, anti-Christian, anti-religious, pro-illegal alien, pro-criminal, anti-Constitutionalist decisions coming out that body as juridical legislation.

You are accepting this candidate on the basis that Bush selected her. That's simply not good enough for me.

Bush selected Norman Mineta as head of the Transportation Department - the guy who has guards frisking little old Swedish-American ladies at airports instead of obvious middle eastern males. He's also the guy who opposed arming pilots.

Bush selected Tom Kean as the Chairman of the 9-11 Commission, a liberal who never supported him, and did everything he could to attack the administration in that body and protect Clinton hack Jamie Goreleck.

Bush retained Louie Freeh as head of the FBI and George Tennet as head of the CIA and they screwed up royally, didn't they?

George Bush appointed Tom Ridge, a real mental light weight as head of Homeland Security.

Bush appointed Chrissie Whitman, a real liberal flake, as head of the EPA, and she used her position to criticize him and his policies.

Bush appointed a real foul ball, Colin Powell as head of the State Department and the slick cynical French, German, and Russian diplomats at the U.N. chewed him up and spit him out like chewing tobacco.

Bush appointed our friend Alberto Gonzales, a guy who is pro-choice, pro-affirmative action and very sympatico to the illegal invaders, as AG.

You could go on and on about misplaced trust by Bush. His best appointments were Rice, Rumsfeld and the choice of Cheney as his running mate.

As for the other judges he selected, I can't assess each and every one of them. But if they were mainly conservatives, its because the Dems realize that the big magilla is the Supreme Court - thats where the final action is and where they thus far, have been so successful with their allies the ACLU, the pro-homosexual groups, the anti-gun groups, etc, in changing the social picture of America.

So that's why I want to be VERY CERTAIN that this candidate is capable of being trusted on the Court, and the only proof is her background, which isn't impressive. Mere verbal accolades from Bush or any one else means little or nothing - the proof is in the performance, and so far this woman ain't got any. On the other hand, Owens, Brown and a host of other individuals who were under consider HAVE the experience and HAVE the record we both want.

And finally, anybody who Harry Reid and Chuckie Schumer approve of, is somebody I am very suspicious of.

Amazing rhetoric? I am stating my position, not an argument.

From the moment her name was announced and the fringe right didnt recognize her name the vitriol and hatred from you guys began and anybody, and I mean anybody who decided to either support her and Bush or sit backj and take an independed wait and see attitude became a target of your atttacks, do not attempt to even try and say that isnt true, simply the facts are on my side on this. I disagree with the President on border control, prescription drugs, NCL, and the deficit yet this time I take a wait and see on a judicial nominee I become his nuthugger, its insulting to me and this site that you guys became this DU'esque reflection of everything you claim to hate. Its sad really.