Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CalRepublican
A fine lawyer does not an outstanding Supreme Court justice necessarily make. And that's what we who have supported Bush deserve.

There are some key decisions coming up. The Democrats and RINOs have enough votes to decline to approve the nominees we really want. Their goal is to convince Sandra Day O'Connor to stay on to make those rulings by refusing to confirm people like Owen, Brown, Luttig, etc.

President Bush's goal is to get someone on board before those rulings who meets his criteria (judges like Scalia, Thomas). He knows Harriet Miers. His father did not know David Souter. It is understandable that conservatives are very concerned and emotional about this. Bush's legacy, not to mention the fate of the Republic, rests on these judicial appointments (and confirmations).

18 posted on 10/04/2005 5:45:19 PM PDT by af_vet_1981
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: af_vet_1981

Sorry, I can't accept that. I don't care that Bush knows her personally, except to the extent that, without that she'd never have been nominated.

A Supreme Court justice has to have a well-developed judicial philosophy, some constitutional theory of how things ought to be.

Based on her biography, we've got no evidence that this has ever been part of her job or anything she seriously has considered.

Those of you who trust Bush on this must also have trusted him that McCain Feingold would be struck down. . .


36 posted on 10/04/2005 5:53:48 PM PDT by CalRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson