I agree and disagree here.
First, I think we do have a bit too much bloodlust on our side. We were itching for a fight and we were mad that we did not get one.
Second, the President has kept all his promises made to the base. He is an honorable man. He asked us to trust him with Miers and we should.
However, I also agree with Rush that a fight with the Libs over a clearly conservative candidate would be quite educational for the public. It is important that we keep educating the public about why we believe in certain things and why the left believes in nothing more than the moment.
When Bush ran in 2000, we knew we were getting a man that would not fight back with the force and energy we wanted. We knew that we were getting a conservative that wanted to set a "new tone". Why do we expect different now?
He fulfilled his promise --- Miers is not another Souter - guaranteed.
Well stated. My sentiments, exactly.
The "public" could not give less of a sh%t.
Re: First, I think we do have a bit too much bloodlust on our side. We were itching for a fight and we were mad that we did not get one.
Exactly! I'm caught. I was one of those you write about. Dead on. I need to chill a bit. Good thought Erik