[LibWrangler]

The extreme right has been rejected, and they are blubbering like babies.

They know that Rov v. Wade is not going to be overturned, and that SCOTUS is not going to intervene to save the Schiavos of the world.

I thought the idea was always that we do not want judges legislating from the bench. Now the complaint from the right is that we don't trust this judge not to vote in our favor.

What a mess.

[KevinDavis]

I think the extreme right do want a judge to legislate from the bench when it comes to issues such as abortion (which I think it is a state issue)..

[Crazieman]

Its about correcting previous legislative rulings.

All hail Bush! March in step! Cannot get your conservative credentials if you criticize, now can you?

All of us criticizing the pick are persona non grata now, right?

[TSchmereL]

We are not blubbering like babies. We are fighting like sled-dogs.

Your inverted understanding of judicial activism not withstanding, we do not want legislation from the bench. We want Strict Constitutional Interpretation.

[Pukin Dog]

You are the mess.

The Extreme Right, as you call us, don't want justices to vote for our side or any side, except for what is spelled out in the Constitution. That is the DEFINTION of a Conservative. Only someone who is NOT a conservative would fail to understand that, and the only way you would be correct would be to call the Constitution itself to be 'extreme'. So shut up.

[puroresu]

Overturning Roe is NOT legislating from the bench.

[Oliver Optic]

The extreme right has been rejected.

If you're saying Republicans no longer want nor need the votes of conservative, pro-life Christians ... I beg to differ.