This is what happens when you vote Republican to try to change the courts -- you get Roberts and Miers, not the kind of strict constructionist justices we need. More Republican jurisprudence in the Souter/Stevens/Warren/Brennan/Blackmun tradition.
And when you don't vote Republican, you get who?
Posters here will defend Bush to the last drop of kool aid.
Instead of realizing that the future of the U.S court decisions rested on a STRONG nominee.
This close friend of Bush is not the conservative we were owed.
To those who think Bush made a conservative pick in this choice better think again.
But, I do know something about logical reasoning. If you start with an untrue set of assumptions, you're going to get the untrue, illogical conclusions that follow.
The absurdity we're starting with here is the assumption that someone can both be a globalist and support conservative US values at home....the two concepts are in themselves contradictory.