Personally, I could care less if she is married or if she has children. Perhaps, she was so devoted to her career that she thought it not fair it any future family. It's the same reason why Catholic priests are not permitted to marry. They are to devote their lives to Christ.
It doesn't make her a bad person, or a good one.
What I do care about, is how she will interpret the constitution.
Roger That ~ that should be the only question!
David Frum--not my favorite guy-- has described her as an anxious, nervous woman (not a rock like Scalia who can withstand the liberal attacks) who is not likely to be able to maintain her conservatism, such as it is, in hte face of mean-spirited attacks from the organized Left.
They'll say she's an unqualified crony who never married (They'll say, "How can she decide who can marry and who can't?" and never had kids (they'll say, " You chose not to have any kids, how can you force a poor woman with an unwanted pregancy to have a child?"
She, per Frum, will crack under the pressure.
Exactly. I totally agree. People can agree to disagree on "the way she would interpret the constitution". These attacks on her marital status and age (and even her looks!) are totally disgusting. Nothing more than klan-like in their behavior.