Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ohioWfan
Let's not draw conclusions based on lack of information and rumors, burst out into fits of anger and rage, and say it's because we're being 'good conservatives,' OK???

You're ansolutely right. We can't draw a single conclusion from this. Doesn't that bother you when the President PROMISED US a judge in the mold of Scalia and Thomas?

I'm not judging Miers because there's nothing to judge her on - problem number one.

I'm judging W because he whimped out and prevented a deserving originalist with judicial experience an opportunity to sit on the bench. It's everything we hate about affirmative action, wrapped up in one nomination.

1,766 posted on 10/03/2005 8:52:25 AM PDT by Rutles4Ever (Stuck on Genius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1741 | View Replies ]


To: Rutles4Ever
When did he promise that his nominees will have previous experience on the bench? Did I miss that?

He promised that he would appoint judges who honor the Constitution, as do Scalia and Thomas.

He apparently knows that Meirs will.

If you want to be mad, it's your right. I just prefer to have some facts to back me up before I lose my cool. And I prefer reserving my anger for the leftists who are trying to destroy this country.

Sorry..........but no matter how you try to persuade anyone here, President Bush isn't the enemy, and neither is Harriet Miers. We have a REAL enemy, and we need to stick together and fight them, and that's just what I intend to do.

And the emotional garbage going on here plays right into their hands.

1,814 posted on 10/03/2005 9:03:32 AM PDT by ohioWfan (If my people which are called by my name will humble themselves and pray......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1766 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson