[Howlin]

Harry Reid supports her, and suggested she would be acceptible. In other words, she is NOT a Scalia or Thomas.

BS.

[safisoft]

Harry Reid supports her, and suggested she would be acceptible. In other words, she is NOT a Scalia or Thomas.

BS

Do you watch the news, or should I ping you when it comes on again?

[batter]

I just heard a clip of Schumer talking about Harriet Miers. He (paraphrasing) said Miers seems to be a step in the right direction to replace O'Conner...

I hope things get better, but right now things don't sound so good to me.

[Cboldt]

Harry Reid supports her, and suggested she would be acceptible.

BS.

I've been looking for Reid's comments regarding the nominee, if he has made any. So far I haven't read or heard any.

[adam_az]

"Harry Reid supports her, and suggested she would be acceptible. In other words, she is NOT a Scalia or Thomas."

"BS."

What a well reasoned response! you sure convinced me. Not.

On Drudge right now:

"HUMAN EVENTS: Harriet Miers contributed $250 to Clinton for President Committee on December 23, 1991, according to Federal Election Commission records. She did not contribute any money to the reelection of President Bush senior, who would face off against the Democrat Clinton in the 1992 presidential election. In 1988, Miers contributed $1,000 to the Democratic presidential primary campaign of then-Sen. Al Gore. At the time Vice President George H.W. Bush was in a Republican presidential primary fight with then-Sen. Dole and Kemp. She did not contribute to any of these Republicans.."

"On a conference call held by the Federalist Society this morning, former RNC Chairman Ed Gillespie admitted sheepishly that Miers was a Democrat througout the 1980s; asked specifically about the Gore contribution, Gillespie said that she was a 'conservative' democrat who later became a republican... Developing..."

Reid did say she was on the no-filibuster list. Why do you think that is?