To: Romish_Papist
also-----I suppose you agree with these 'conservatives' who are saying something is seriously wrong with her because she is either ugly, gay or a b*tch because she never married?? Is that another requirement of being the perfect 'conservative'???
1,054 posted on
10/03/2005 6:49:40 AM PDT by
Fawn
(Try Not----Do or Do not ~~ Yoda)
To: Fawn
Now you're putting words in my mouth. I agree with the Conservatives who are more than a little PO'd that Bush is acting as though he'd never promised conservative judges in the mold of Scalia/Thomas. I have every right to be ticked about that. In fact, I think more "conservatives" should be ticked about it. As to her being ugly, gay, a b*tch, or never married, I'm a single 30 year old man who ain't exactly GQ sexy. Nor do I care. So no, I neither said nor do I support such comments. I assure you my comments are based on nothing quite so petty. It seems to me that the Bushbots (and I used to be one) are ignoring the campaign promises he's breaking. For goodness sake, Harry Reid said he's likes this candidate! How can this possibly be good in any way?
1,101 posted on
10/03/2005 6:56:17 AM PDT by
Romish_Papist
(Scalia/Thomas mold? Pfffft... just nice words to get Bush elected... he didn't mean it.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson