To: johnmecainrino
New York Times already has its lead:
"In a shocking display of hubris, the White House chose what many experts believe to be the worst possible candidate for the Supreme Court Vacancy. [Fill in candidate's ame when we found out who it is] was announced this morning at 8 AM, sending shockwaves of disappointment. "I can't believe the President couldn't come up with anyone better" said one White House insider."
To: ClearCase_guy
You know its a crime to hack into their computers like that!
24 posted on
10/03/2005 3:49:33 AM PDT by
RWR8189
( Extremism in defense of liberty is no vice. Moderation in the pursuit of justice is no virtue.)
To: ClearCase_guy
New York Times already has its lead: "In a shocking display of hubris, the White House chose what many experts believe to be the worst possible candidate for the Supreme Court Vacancy. [Fill in candidate's ame when we found out who it is] was announced this morning at 8 AM, sending shockwaves of disappointment. "I can't believe the President couldn't come up with anyone better" said one White House insider."
Man you nailed it there.
38 posted on
10/03/2005 3:57:39 AM PDT by
Lukringwithintent
(So you say you want a Revolution Daily Kos?)
To: ClearCase_guy
To: ClearCase_guy
That story is the one which "conservatives" here at FR will be telling. I don't know which group of Know-Nothings hates and distrusts Bush more.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson