Very strange, wasn't it? I can understand someone wishing to remain skeptical and not jump to conclusions, and wishing to wait for more information, but a couple of posters here seemed intent on heading off anything in the way of speculation. It was so consistent and persistent, it seemed to me they had a definite agenda.
I thought they had an agenda as well. It was like they were covering for what the OU Administration was saying.
What was strange was that none of them confronted me directly. If they disagreed with what I was saying, why not ask me direct?
When 2+2 do not add up, you speculate about what if's which is investigative journalism but they wanted none of any speculation that could be checked out. I will say one thing for our local media including the OU Daily -- they are not reporting without sourcing which is why they are sitting on some things.
I found it weird too, especially when some of those posters profiles show they just signed up for FR.