Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Spunky
Here's the difference. To my knowledge and probably everyone elses, on this threads knowledge, IT WAS NOT DONE IN FRONT OF ANYONE. THERE WERE NO PERSONAL EYE WITNESSES.

Do you have evidence otherwise?


The guy had mental problems, he blew himself up in a public area. Whether there were witnesses or not doesn't matter - you don't go to a public area intending to commit suicide if you didn't want attention.

If he didn't want attention, he could have stayed at home and blew himself up, or hung himself, or offed himself in any other number of ways.

It's no different than somebody going to a bridge in San Francisco and throwing themselves off - his method was just a little bit more fancy, that's all.
3,514 posted on 10/02/2005 10:30:04 PM PDT by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3030 | View Replies ]


To: af_vet_rr

At midday, press reports indicated that five people had been injured. If this has changed, I'm not aware of it.


3,518 posted on 10/02/2005 10:31:55 PM PDT by conservativepoet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3514 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson