To: Spunky
Here's the difference. To my knowledge and probably everyone elses, on this threads knowledge, IT WAS NOT DONE IN FRONT OF ANYONE. THERE WERE NO PERSONAL EYE WITNESSES.
Do you have evidence otherwise?
The guy had mental problems, he blew himself up in a public area. Whether there were witnesses or not doesn't matter - you don't go to a public area intending to commit suicide if you didn't want attention.
If he didn't want attention, he could have stayed at home and blew himself up, or hung himself, or offed himself in any other number of ways.
It's no different than somebody going to a bridge in San Francisco and throwing themselves off - his method was just a little bit more fancy, that's all.
To: af_vet_rr
At midday, press reports indicated that five people had been injured. If this has changed, I'm not aware of it.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson