Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: hoboken109
I just dont see a reason YET to call this a failed terrorist attack .

Nor am I calling this a "for sure failed terrorist attack". It seems as though you are minimizing everything that points away from anything but an innocent pipe bomb incident. (Multiple bombs ..... suspect blown to bits .... percussion felt in the stands, etc)

If it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck .....

Hope I'm wrong, but my impression of you before was that of a disruptor of sorts. Welcome to Freerepublic, in any case. We'll know in due time what your thoughts are.

Nam Vet

1,134 posted on 10/01/2005 11:06:49 PM PDT by Nam Vet (Don't imagine you can change a dedicated liberal-unless he's in diapers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1056 | View Replies ]


To: Nam Vet

I agree, although we all need to see these reports confirmed and verified by multiple witnesses in the next few days. How many typical suicidal people are ambitious enough to go out and acquire high-grade explosives so they can blow themselves up outside a packed football stadium? When a shot in the head would work, why would someone apparently (according to reports) use enough explosives to kill perhaps 20 or more people? This is not a typical suicide, and there are definite indications of a failed terror attack.


1,161 posted on 10/01/2005 11:16:53 PM PDT by defenderSD (At half past midnight, the ghost of Vince Foster wanders through the West Wing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1134 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson