Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Scientists discover moon orbiting so-called 10th planet (nicknamed 'Xena')
ap on Monterey Herald ^ | 10/1/05 | Alicia Chang - ap

Posted on 10/01/2005 5:10:46 PM PDT by NormsRevenge

LOS ANGELES - The astronomers who claim to have discovered the 10th planet in the solar system have made another intriguing announcement: it has a moon.

While observing the new, so-called planet from Hawaii last month, a team of astronomers led by Michael Brown of the California Institute of Technology spotted a faint object trailing next to it. Because it was moving, astronomers ruled it was a moon and not a background star, which is stationary.

The moon discovery is important because it can help scientists determine the new planet's mass. In July, Brown announced the discovery of an icy, rocky object larger than Pluto in the Kuiper Belt, a disc of icy bodies beyond Neptune. Brown labeled the object a planet and nicknamed it Xena after the lead character in the former TV series "Xena: Warrior Princess."

By determining the moon's distance and orbit around Xena, scientists can calculate how heavy Xena is. For example, the faster a moon goes around a planet, the more massive a planet is.

But the newly discovered moon, nicknamed Gabrielle after Xena's faithful traveling sidekick in the TV series, likely will not quell the debate over what exactly is a planet and whether Pluto should keep its status. The problem is there is no official definition for a planet and setting standards like size limits potentially invites other objects to take the "planet" label.

Possessing a moon is not a criteria of planethood since Mercury and Venus are moonless planets. Brown said he expected to find a moon orbiting Xena because many Kuiper Belt objects are paired with moons.

The moon is about 155 miles wide and 60 times fainter than Xena, the farthest-known object in the solar system. It is currently 9 billion miles away from the sun, or about three times Pluto's current distance from the sun.

Scientists believe Xena's moon was formed when Kuiper Belt objects collided with one another. The Earth's moon formed in a similar way when Earth crashed into an object the size of Mars.

The moon was first spotted by a 10-meter telescope at the W.M. Keck Observatory in Hawaii on Sept. 10. Scientists expect to learn more about the moon's composition during further observations with the Hubble Space Telescope in November.

Brown planned to submit a paper describing the moon discovery to the Astrophysical Journal next week.

The International Astronomical Union, a group of scientists responsible for naming planets, is deciding on formal names for Xena and Gabrielle.

---__

On the Net:

California Institute of Technology: http://www.caltech.edu

W.M. Keck Observatory: http://www2.keck.hawaii.edu


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 10thplanet; astronomy; kbo; planetx; sedna; xplanets
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last
To: Simmy2.5
What about Joxer?
21 posted on 10/01/2005 5:51:18 PM PDT by Cheburashka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: tet68
It wouldn't have been Mars. What scientists think is that some random planet about the size of Mars crashed into the earth and merged with it, causing it to violently quiver and quake. This process then resulted in pieces of the earth's crust being spat out into space, eventually forming a ring, like Saturn's rings. And then after that, the ring eventually coalesced into the moon.
22 posted on 10/01/2005 5:51:54 PM PDT by inquest (FTAA delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
spotted a faint object trailing next to it.

You mean the mother ship has launced a probe? Maybe Louis Fairy-Khan's days are numbered after all.

23 posted on 10/01/2005 6:06:11 PM PDT by ApplegateRanch (Mohamophages of the world, unite!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Simmy2.5
What's next? Mulder and Scully?

Cisco & Pancho. Panch has to be the planet, though, since he is the fat one.

24 posted on 10/01/2005 6:09:56 PM PDT by ApplegateRanch (Mohamophages of the world, unite!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Simmy2.5

At least Xena and Gabby set an example of TV characters that look like healthy women and not emaciated heroin waifs.


25 posted on 10/01/2005 6:12:17 PM PDT by coydog (My bathroom djinn can beat up your bathroom djinn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: coydog

I think they should stick with Roman mythology though.

Who's left among the Olympians?
Juno (too far away from Jupiter?)
Hades (Hmm...)
Vesta (I think there already is an asteroid)
Minerva (Hmm..)
Apollo (no -- associated with the Sun)
Diana (maybe...the huntress and all)
Vulcan (would make people think of Star Trek)
Ceres (already an asteroid)
Bacchus (Hmm...)

Also, does the position of this new planet contradict Bode's law?


26 posted on 10/01/2005 6:37:42 PM PDT by scrabblehack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

While the debate is meaningless, the continuing discovery of planets or whatever they are called out beyond Pluto/Neptune, way beyond, probably means there are planets all the way to the next star. It is possible a starship might go directly to the next star, but it is more likely that the Kuiper objects and Oort objects present a natural evolution--stepping stones--in the same direction.


27 posted on 10/01/2005 6:41:58 PM PDT by RightWhale (Repeal the law of the excluded middle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tet68

regarding supposed impact origin of the Moon:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/1234919/posts?page=10#10


28 posted on 11/08/2005 9:58:44 AM PST by SunkenCiv (Down with Dhimmicrats! I last updated my FR profile on Wednesday, November 2, 2005.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner

She can't a whole moon!
A partial moon maybe...


As a poet I once knew said, "... her ass
looked like the bottom of heaven!"


29 posted on 11/08/2005 2:51:21 PM PST by tet68 ( " We would not die in that man's company, that fears his fellowship to die with us...." Henry V.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Why is there no difinition of 'plantet'?

I would think that anything massive enough to shape itself into a shpere would be a good definition.


30 posted on 06/09/2006 11:22:55 AM PDT by Mr. K (Some days even my lucky rocketship underpants don't help...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tet68

there is a huge ring of debri between earth and mars- they think that may have once been a planet


31 posted on 06/09/2006 11:26:05 AM PDT by Mr. K (Some days even my lucky rocketship underpants don't help...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

 
X-Planets
· join · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post new topic ·

32 posted on 06/18/2007 2:19:23 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (Time heals all wounds, particularly when they're not yours. Profile updated June 15, 2007.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scrabblehack

I read somewhere that it had been named “Eris”.


33 posted on 06/18/2007 2:29:53 AM PDT by Victoria_R
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: tet68
What object was it?

Today we call the resulting post crash debris by the unimaginative names, "Earth" and "Moon".

Facts are elusive and science does often produce absolutes, but the crash hypothesis explains why the Earth's spin axis is titled so profoundly with respect to its orbital plane and that huge gash west of California called the Pacific Ocean, and why the Earth-Moon system is the closest thing to a double planet in the solar system, inter alia.

34 posted on 06/18/2007 2:51:05 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (I never consented to live in the Camp of the Saints.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Victoria_R

Right — but this is the Greek name. The Roman equivalent is “Discordia.” It’s not an attractive name for a planet, though.


35 posted on 06/18/2007 11:27:19 AM PDT by scrabblehack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson