> Where did I promote ID or creationism?
You've come out against evolution. There are few other options.
> In FACT, I said, "I don't care what the truth is, I just want whatever "IT" is, to be TRUE."
Circular reasoning. If it's the truth, It's true. if it's not true, it's not the truth.
> You claim "SCIENCE" but you want different rules for your religion.
What religion would that be? Remember, only those with little understanding of science woudl be hare-brained enough to suggest that science is a religion. So, what religion are you referring to?
> evolution claims to be SCIENCE so it has to stand by it's SCIENCE, like all other Scientific theories.
Which means that it must stand on the Scientific EVIDENCE that exists.
And it has repeatedly done so. That's why it's accepted sceince.
> your evonazi ilk
Godwin!
> Such animosity and anger shows way more about you than it does about those you attack.
Indeed it does, "evonazi-boy."
You've come out against evolution. There are few other options.
So what you're saying is that there are two possible answers to the question of living origins. Only one can be right, and the other wrong. But neither one is "unscientific", unless the question itself is beyond the reach of science to answer.
You are apparently incapable of open minded logical thought.
A trait that you share with your "Darwinian evolution", ("it's SCIENCE!", "it's accepted SCIENCE, I tells ya!", "SCIENCE!", "SCIENCE!"), co-RELIGIONISTS.
see post # 577