You've come out against evolution. There are few other options.
So what you're saying is that there are two possible answers to the question of living origins. Only one can be right, and the other wrong. But neither one is "unscientific", unless the question itself is beyond the reach of science to answer.
> there are two possible answers to the question of living origins.
There are many. But only two that get any play. Again, contemplate that you are in "The Matrix." Silly, but there you go with option 3.
> But neither one is "unscientific"
Incorrect. The assumption of the supernatural is inheirantly unscientific.