Replies

I suggest you work on your reading comprehension, where did I claim to be a "Creationist"? Where did I promote ID or creationism?

In FACT, I said, "I don't care what the truth is, I just want whatever "IT" is, to be TRUE." True in this case meaning that it is able to stand up to questions and doubts, on it's own merits.

I see that you have trouble with the concept of "Truth", that you confuse probability with reality, and that you appear clueless about cumulative error.

As to your typically inane and pathetic statement, "..., I do not need to know every last detail about evolution to know that appeals to superstition to explain a few holes in the data record is just silly."

A "few holes" indeed.

You claim "SCIENCE" but you want different rules for your religion. Funny how that works,

No, evolution claims to be SCIENCE so it has to stand by it's SCIENCE, like all other Scientific theories.
Which means that it must stand on the Scientific EVIDENCE that exists.

So why don't you just PROVE your evolution fairy tale? You can't, (at least no better than the other religions and creation myths of the world can). Because of those "holes" you dismiss out of hand, dismiss because of your FAITH in evolution.

You, and all of your evonazi ilk, ALWAYS react exactly like jihadi islamic animals whenever anyone question's or doubts your RELIGION of Darwinian evolution.

Such animosity and anger shows way more about you than it does about those you attack.

> Where did I promote ID or creationism?

You've come out against evolution. There are few other options.

> In FACT, I said, "I don't care what the truth is, I just want whatever "IT" is, to be TRUE."

Circular reasoning. If it's the truth, It's true. if it's not true, it's not the truth.

> You claim "SCIENCE" but you want different rules for your religion.

What religion would that be? Remember, only those with little understanding of science woudl be hare-brained enough to suggest that science is a religion. So, what religion are you referring to?

> evolution claims to be SCIENCE so it has to stand by it's SCIENCE, like all other Scientific theories.
Which means that it must stand on the Scientific EVIDENCE that exists.

And it has repeatedly done so. That's why it's accepted sceince.

> your evonazi ilk

Godwin!

> Such animosity and anger shows way more about you than it does about those you attack.

Indeed it does, "evonazi-boy."