Posted on 09/30/2005 12:23:21 PM PDT by Pikamax
WASHINGTON, Sept. 29 - The White House distanced itself today from the comments of a prominent Republican who said on a recent radio program that the nation's crime rate could potentially be reduced through aborting blacks.
The White House called the comments, made by William J. Bennett, the former Republican secretary of education, off base. The White House spokesman, Scott McClellan, said that President George W. Bush "believes the comments were not appropriate."
Mr. Bennett has said the remarks were taken out of context, noting that he immediately said such abortions would be "reprehensible."
Mr. Bennett, who served as drug czar for the president's father, came under fire from Democratic Congressional leaders on Thursday for the comments, which were made on a his radio show, "Bill Bennett's Morning in America," earlier this week.
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
Naw can't have that coming out, might scare the donors.
Free speech is never appropriate. That's why those freedom-lovers (ACLU) are rushing to Bennet's support:
"Since 1920, the ACLU has been fighting to preserve our freedom of speech. Use the resources on this page to learn more and take action to protect the right to free speech guaranteed to all Americans by the Bill of Rights."
the white house doesn't need to "take a look" at anything. Bennett's comment are his own, he is not a member of the administration. they need not make any judgement on this either way.
what happens next week, is everything that Rush says now have to be supported or refuted by the white house?
Bill Bennett should be applauded for saying what he did. Seems conservative people are not allowed to speak anymore. If we don't stand up and fight we are no better than the opposition. The White House has no busines getting involved.
The White House should have just stayed out of it. Bennett is a private citizen.
With all the reports surfacing about the number of blacks that are incarcerated as to the number of whites plus the issue of racial profiling, Bennett's remarks make sense but like he said, "such abortions would be reprehensible."
(Denny Crane: "Sometimes you can only look for answers from God and failing that... and Fox News".)
You're right--not their man, not their problem. They shouldn't have had to feel like they had to say anthing at all about that.
The White House is blaming Soros? Holy crap. There's a can of worms when the administration openly speculates like that.
I take it you sit in the Bush amen corner, and no doubt belong to the GOP Big Tent full of RINOs, liberals and moderates. You may be one of the GOP Big Tent cheerleaders, but we can see you're no conservative.
You "GOP at any cost" drones are pathetic.
You know a year ago, maybe even a little less I would have fought you tooth and nail because of your statement, but aside from a few issues I really can't disagree anymore. I defend this Administration non-stop against a lot of my friends and they end up saying I'm further right than W (when all I want is controlled spending and immigration reform)!!
You're right they don't... but they already did. And it was wrong. And they should correct it.
As for the White House supporting or refuting something Rush Limbaugh says, we've already been there/done that:
Q What's the President's view of the comment that got Rush Limbaugh in trouble?
MR. McCLELLAN: I think that Rush Limbaugh addressed the matter.
Q You know, Scott, when you click onto the White House website and you enter the word, "bigotry," the President has addressed this issue 136 times. Why would not -- why wouldn't you, on his behalf, want to address it in this instance, where someone has associated the selection of athletes on the basis of their race for certain positions on the field?
MR. McCLELLAN: I did answer the question, and I think that he addressed the matter -- I think that Rush Limbaugh addressed the matter.
Q Is it because Limbaugh is a political ally and often someone who supports administration causes and so forth that you don't want to address this yourself?
MR. McCLELLAN: You've asked the question, and I've responded to it.
I think someones getting a little to much MSM feces on their lips.
I'm with you, but let's add a more aggresive execution of the WOT and a little more push-back on RATs and the media. Then I'll be happy.
STFU White House.
I see no issues with a stronger push in either of those areas.
Exatamundo.....
Like medicos who would put certain diagnosis 'off limits' the disease can never be cured...
imo
Did the WH even read a transcript of what he really said? NO! What dummies they are, taking all the blame all the time! Get some cojones! Gah!
>>> If the big picture for me wasn't about the Supreme Court, I think I would consider this Administration an embarassment on many levels now. <<<
This Administration is an embarassment on many levels, now!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.