Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: demlosers
Wasn't a 'strict constructionist' the prime requisite?..
3 posted on 09/27/2005 9:21:04 AM PDT by joesnuffy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: joesnuffy

That was when Bush needed the votes of social conservatives. As he will never run for office again, he has no need to fulfill such promises.

That's not to say that he has or will betray us, but Roberts is more mysterious than a whole host of other nominees would have been.


7 posted on 09/27/2005 9:26:07 AM PDT by Aetius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: joesnuffy

Janice Rogers Brown IS a strict constructionist.


27 posted on 09/27/2005 10:26:07 AM PDT by conservative blonde (Conservative Blonde)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: joesnuffy

"Wasn't a 'strict constructionist' the prime requisite?.."

What you promise to get elected is not always what you do.

The voting public has to give credit for good intentions.

It will be interesting to see who is a man of his word.


57 posted on 09/27/2005 7:03:53 PM PDT by Spirited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson