[Nathan Zachary]

Assumed to be 27,000 years old how? Assumed to be a wolly mammoth how? Babies of what? Why would it be a "grave"??
Did they believe in God 27,000 years ago and bury the dead in graves?

Carbon dating? LMAO!

[ASA Vet]

Belief in the supernatual isn't a requirement for burial.

[Clara Lou]

I'm just trying to figure out what it is that you're laughing at. Don't you think that they can pretty well identify the bone of a mammoth? Let's see...Austria...that would make them babies of whatever humans were living in Austria at that time? Seems logical. Why wouldn't it be a grave? You don't have to be a Christian or a Jew to bury your dead lovingly.

[Artemis Webb]

I would think burial goes a long way back. Burial has a lot more to do with ridding the area of the smell of decay than a belief in the Lord.

The article doesn't say "assumed" to be a woolly mammoth. It says that it WAS the omoplate of a mammoth.

Babies of what? It looks like babies of humans to me.

Nathan Zachary? LMAO!