Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Monkey Face; King Prout
"I don't remember exactly, but the concept was that the cancer cells were destroyed completely by the heat."

Actually, that was its downfall. That it did not completely eliminate the cancer cells.

The concept was, that cancer cells tend to clump, and grow abnormally, with much of their metabolism given over to reproduction -- under that circumstance, they should be susceptible to heat stress, dying readily when exposed to even mild amounts of it. One could elevate the body temperature, or isolate the tumor and raise the temperature locally. Many cancer cells could be expected to succumb to this ordeal, but unfortunately not all.

Those tumor cells on the periphery were hardly affected at all, and of course they resumed their destructive growth as soon as the heat regimen was removed.

6,578 posted on 10/26/2005 5:56:58 PM PDT by NicknamedBob (I'm sticking with George W! ... He's right on the money!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6540 | View Replies ]


To: NicknamedBob

ah.


6,579 posted on 10/26/2005 6:09:06 PM PDT by King Prout (many accuse me of being overly literal... this would not be a problem if many were not under-precise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6578 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson