Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AFPhys; jeffers
Computer predictions (at this stage) with the very complex stagnant pressure/fronts conditions in that area of the storm ARE much, much more random than realistic.

Almost all of the time, strong fronts and pressure systems across the country "move" the hurricane after it hits land: with this one, the computer programs are doing the "legendary" butterfly wing flapping" of (almost) random motion as different models use different criteria.

So, the ones earlier this morning showed: stopping over Ark. and Texarkana area, stopping then going left (SW), stopping and going right (E-SE).

They don't know.
241 posted on 09/24/2005 11:21:40 AM PDT by Robert A Cook PE (-I contribute to FR monthly, but ABBCNNBCBS supports Hillary's Secular Sexual Socialism every day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 225 | View Replies ]


To: Robert A. Cook, PE; jeffers
Several of the models have been predicting the dithering about for two days now. We'll see within a day or so, but as of right now, I would love to be able to register a "six-pack" bet with the "360º loop" programmers and see how confident they are in their programs.

We'll know soon who is right, but this
http://www.hpc.ncep.noaa.gov/qpf/p120i12.gif from NOAA shows that their model would bet on my side, not the loopers'.
290 posted on 09/24/2005 11:37:05 AM PDT by AFPhys ((.Praying for President Bush, our troops, their families, and all my American neighbors..))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 241 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson