Join Us At Today's Iranian Alert Thread – The Most Underreported Story Of The Year!
Click on the link above!"If you want on or off this Iran ping list, Freepmail DoctorZin”
IAEA -> Referral -> UN Security Council -> Debate -> Nuclear Iran
This is a major victory for us.
"Or else we will be very angry, and we will write you a letter, telling you how angry we are."
Join Us At Today's Iranian Alert Thread – The Most Underreported Story Of The Year!
Click on the link above!"If you want on or off this Iran ping list, Freepmail DoctorZin”
****************************************************
Today: September 24, 2005 at 9:32:0 PDT
VIENNA, Austria (AP) -
The 35-nation board of the U.N. atomic watchdog agency was to consider a motion Saturday that could lead to Iran's referral to the U.N. Security Council for violating a nuclear arms control treaty - something the United States has been urging for years.
The council possibly could impose sanctions if it determined that Iran violated the treaty.
But the final language of the European Union text on Iran was in flux before the International Atomic Energy Agency board reconvened. Earlier, EU negotiators offered to make last-minute changes to satisfy Russia and China, who oppose reporting Tehran to the Security Council, where Moscow and Beijing have veto powers.
Although board decisions usually are taken by consensus, deep divisions on the issue likely meant a vote would be taken.
A diplomat familiar with the talks between the European Union, Moscow and Beijing said direct mention of Security Council referral for Iran's "noncompliance" with the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty would remain in any draft considered, but other language could be weakened.
The Europeans were "working on buying Chinese and Russian backing," said a diplomat speaking anonymously because of the talks' sensitivity.
He suggested the Europeans - and their chief backer, Washington - would settle for Moscow and Beijing abstaining from a vote on the text.
Russia and China, along with most developing nations on the IAEA board, oppose referral, but Western diplomats said a majority of board members support the motion.
Washington suspects Iran is trying to develop atomic bombs, while Tehran maintains its activities are for generating electricity. Britain, France and Germany have been negotiating with Iran on behalf of the 25-nation EU.
If a draft setting up the possibility of reporting Iran to the council passes, Tehran said it would restart uranium enrichment - a possible path to nuclear arms, diplomats accredited to the agency said. Iran also warned it could block IAEA inspectors' access, which it agreed to under a document not yet ratified by Tehran.
The diplomats - who sought anonymity because their information was confidential - said Friday that both threats were contained in unsigned letters and shown by a member of the Iranian delegation to the IAEA chief, Mohamed ElBaradei.
If signed and submitted, the letters become part of the official record.
The EU motion, as tabled Friday, calls on the IAEA board to consider reporting Iran to the Security Council. The motion mentions noncompliance with provisions of the NPT and suspicions that Iran's nuclear activities could threaten international peace and security, according to a copy obtained by The Associated Press.
However, the draft did not mention sanctions, in recognition of Russian and Chinese opposition.
Still, it was unequivocal in saying that - unless Iran ends uranium conversion and clears up questions remaining about its past nuclear activities - grounds exist for it to be referred to the Security Council.
A nation's failure to comply with the treaty is automatic grounds for a report to the Security Council under IAEA statutes, and the draft said "Iran's many failures and breaches of its obligations ... constitute noncompliance."
Additionally, Iran's spotty record on cooperating with an IAEA investigation that began in 2002 has led to an "absence of confidence that Iran's nuclear program is exclusively for peaceful purposes," the document said. That finding puts Iran "within the competence of the Security Council, as the organ bearing the main responsibility for the maintenance of international peace and security," the text said.
The draft did not specify a time frame for referral, but outlined what Iran must do to avoid being brought before the Security Council, including giving IAEA experts access to nuclear-related documents and sites, suspending all enrichment-related and reprocessing activities and ratifying an inspection agreement with the IAEA.
The Europeans for years avoided U.S. demands for support in its push to haul Iran before the Security Council. They reluctantly swung behind Washington last month after Tehran effectively walked away from talks with Britain, France and Germany meant to reduce suspicions about its nuclear aims and began uranium conversion.
---
On the Net:
International Atomic Energy Agency, http://www.iaea.org
--
A resolution -- YIKES!!! A resolution that may lead to a (gasp) referral! Terrifying!!!!
bump
FOR: Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Canada, Equador, France, Germany, Ghana, Hungary, India, Italy, Japan, Republic of Korea, Netherlands, Peru, Poland, Portugal, Singapore, Slovenia, Sweden, UK, USA
AGAINST: Venezuela
ABSTAIN: Yemen, Algeria, Brazil, China, Mexico, Nigeria, Pakistan, Russia, South Africa, Sri Lanka, Tunisia, Viet Nam
Chavez. Mexico abstained? They should get a riot act reading. Notice the commies, Islamic countries, and oil producers on the list.
Good vote! Does anyone have the breakdown of the actual vote? Who were 1 against, with 12 abstentions?
