Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AntiGuv; Zacs Mom

He was just saying we won't get the devastation like we would on the east side of the storm. He still emphasized up to 125 mph at Galveston.


1,750 posted on 09/23/2005 3:12:32 AM PDT by Flyer (Houston FReepers ~ http://houstonliberty.com/forums/ ~ (SW Houston)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1743 | View Replies ]


To: Flyer

Yes, Galveston is not the place to be.


1,753 posted on 09/23/2005 3:14:44 AM PDT by Jalapeno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1750 | View Replies ]

To: Flyer

Okay, that makes more sense.


1,754 posted on 09/23/2005 3:16:19 AM PDT by Zacs Mom (Proud wife of a Marine! ... and purveyor of "rampant, unedited dialogue")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1750 | View Replies ]

To: Flyer
Then, he's ignoring the cone of uncertainty, which covers well to the west of Houston, and also ignoring that the computer models have recentered over Galveston. I'm not trying to be willfully pessimistic, but the above info is accurate, and Houston/Galveston are certainly not out of the woods. There's at least a 33% chance I would say that the eye moves west of Galveston.
1,756 posted on 09/23/2005 3:16:40 AM PDT by AntiGuv (™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1750 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson